HR 384. (Mortgage-backed securities buyout conditions) Frank of Massachusetts amendment that would require some bailout money to be committed for foreclosure mitigation/On agreeing to the amendment
house Roll Call 19
Jan 15, 2009
|
Member's Vote
(progressive
or not) |
Progressive Position
|
Progressive Result
(win or loss)
|
This vote was on an amendment by Barney Frank, D-Mass., that would require the Treasury Department to commit between $40 billion and $100 billion to ensure renters living in a building being foreclosed upon would be protected. The amendment was offered to a bill that would create new conditions on the use of some $700 billion in funding to purchase certain “toxic” mortgage assets weighing down the balance books of banks and companies. This “bailout” money is intended to help ease a credit crunch that is stifling business across the nation. “Now, I don’t want to see the auto companies fail. Nobody in America does. But name me an industry in America that isn’t struggling. Is Congress so wise that they can decide which industries are deserving the taxpayer bailout and which aren’t?” Hensarling said. “And if it’s the auto industry today, is it the airlines industry tomorrow? Who is it next week? Again, how can everybody who’s struggling bail out everybody else who’s struggling?” “Now, it doesn’t get specific as to institutions. It shouldn’t. We don’t pick institutions here. We empower them and direct them, in some cases, to deal with the whole economy and with classes of institutions. There is no selection here by Congress of this or that company or even line of business,” Frank said, then suggested that it was the Bush administration that decided where the first raft of funding should go, including to automakers. |
Y | Y | W |
Issue Areas:
|
|||
Key: Y=Yea, N=Nay, W=Win, L=Loss |