|
Roll Call 89.
(H.R. 1837) On an amendment to require water resources in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to be managed in a way that complies with state and federal law and relies on the best available science
Feb 29, 2012.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 88.
(H.R. 1837) On an amendment to prevent a Republican bill from diverting water supplies intended to protect the environment of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta
Feb 29, 2012.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 87.
(H.R. 1837) On an amendment to require farmers to pay interest on the debt used to construct irrigation projects that benefit them
Feb 29, 2012.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 86.
(H.R. 1837) On an amendment to scrap an attempt to extend and lengthen contracts to ship water from the environmentally sensitive Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta to farms and communities in the San Joaquin Valley of California
Feb 29, 2012.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 85.
(H.R. 1837) On an amendment to put off a change in the management plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta until federal agencies can show the new plan will not harm the quality of the water supply for Delta farmers
Feb 29, 2012.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 84.
(H.R. 1837) On an amendment to put off a change in the management plan for the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta until federal agencies can show the new plan will not harm the safety of the water supply for area residents
Feb 29, 2012.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 83.
(H.R. 1837) On an amendment to put off a change in management of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta unless federal agencies can be sure no jobs in northern California would be lost
Feb 29, 2012.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 81.
(H.Res. 566) On a resolution setting a time limit for debate and determining which amendments could be offered to legislation that would alter the management of one of California’s largest waterways to favor agribusiness over environmental and conservation interests
Feb 29, 2012.
|
Y |
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 80.
(H.Res. 566) On a motion to end debate and immediately vote on a resolution setting a time limit for debate and amendments that can be offered to legislation altering the management of one of California’s largest waterways to favor agribusiness over environmental and conservation interests
Feb 29, 2012.
|
Y |
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 68.
(H.R. 3408) On an amendment that would prevent oil companies from drilling in newly opened federal territory if they are exempt from paying royalties for drilling in other federal territory
Feb 16, 2012.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 553.
(H.R. 2354) On an amendment that would have increased funding by $450 million for research and development of clean energy technology (such as wind and solar energy), and would also have cut $450 million from research and development of fossil fuel-based energy (such as oil and gas)
Jul 12, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 552.
(H.R. 2354) On an amendment that would have required the Energy Department to set aside $10 million for the production of Plutonium 238, a radioactive isotope that can be used for the production of nuclear energy
Jul 12, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 544.
(H.R 2354) On an amendment that would have increased funding by $24 million for renewable energy development programs, and also would have cut $50 million from fossil fuel-based energy (such as oil and gas) research and development
Jul 12, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 469.
(H.R. 2021) On an amendment that would have required oil and gas companies to disclose all federal subsidies they receive on applications for oil drilling permits
Jun 22, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 467.
(H.R. 2021) On an amendment that would have allowed the Environmental Protection Agency to continue to measure air pollution from oil drilling on both onshore and offshore locations—meaning on water as well as on land.
Jun 22, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 465.
(H.R. 2021, H.R. 1249) Legislation that would ease air pollution regulations for oil and gas drilling, as well as a separate, unrelated patent reform bill – On the resolution setting a time limit for debate and determining which amendments could be offered to both bills
Jun 22, 2011.
|
Y |
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 464.
(H.R. 2021, H.R. 1249) Legislation that would ease air pollution regulations for oil and gas drilling, as well as a separate, unrelated patent reform bill—On bringing to a final vote the resolution setting a time limit for debate and determining which amendments could be offered to both bills
Jun 22, 2011.
|
Y |
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 463.
(H.R. 2021, H.R. 1249) Legislation that would ease air pollution regulations for oil and gas drilling, as well as a separate, unrelated patent reform bill–On whether to bring up the resolution setting a time limit for debate and determining which amendments could be offered to both bills
Jun 22, 2011.
|
Y |
N |
L |
|
Roll Call 455.
(H.R. 2112) On an amendment that would have eliminated federal subsidies for farmers earning more than $250,000 per year
Jun 16, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 452.
(H.R. 2112) On an amendment that would have cut $11 million from a program that kills predators of livestock
Jun 16, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 443.
(H.R. 2112) On an amendment that would have limited federal subsidies provided to farms to $125,000
Jun 16, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 142.
(H.R. 1) On an amendment that would have eliminated $50 million in federal funding for oil and gas research at the Energy Department.
Feb 18, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 114.
(H.R. 1) On an amendment that would have limited agricultural subsidies provided to farmers by making farms earning more than $250,000 per year ineligible for federal subsidies.
Feb 18, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 109.
(H.R. 1) On an amendment that would have prohibited federal funds from being used to give new leases—under which recipients paid no royalties—to oil and gas companies to drill for oil on public lands.
Feb 18, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 101.
(H.R. 1) On an amendment that would have eliminated $150 million in funding for Brazil’s cotton industry.
Feb 18, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
|
Roll Call 56.
(H.R. 1) On an amendment that would have increased funding for research on new energy technology by $20 million and cut funding for fossil fuel research by $20 million. This amendment was offered to legislation funding the federal government (such legislation is known as a “continuing resolution, or “CR”) through September 2011, and cutting $61 billion in federal funding for many government programs.
Feb 16, 2011.
|
N |
Y |
L |
![[POW!]](images/boxer_l2.gif)