What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2023-24 Lifetime 2023-24 % Rating
1 Lee, Summer D
PA-12
100.00 100.00 99.04 99.04 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
2 Tokuda, Jill D
HI-2
99.21 99.21 98.07 98.07 Strong Dem + 15.88 rank 5
3 Balint, Becca D
VT-AL
99.20 99.20 98.53 98.53 Strong Dem + 15.87 rank 5
4 Casar, Greg D
TX-35
98.81 98.81 98.87 98.87 Strong Dem + 15.48 rank 5
5 Frost, Maxwell D
FL-10
98.81 98.81 98.72 98.72 Strong Dem + 15.48 rank 5
6 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.44 99.60 99.05 99.35 Strong Dem + 15.11 rank 5
7 Foushee, Valerie D
NC-4
98.41 98.41 97.24 97.24 Strong Dem + 15.08 rank 5
8 Ramirez, Delia D
IL-3
98.41 98.41 98.69 98.69 Strong Dem + 15.08 rank 5
9 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
98.34 97.62 98.57 96.60 Strong Dem + 15.01 rank 5
10 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
98.20 99.20 99.29 99.36 Strong Dem + 14.87 rank 5
11 Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
98.15 97.22 97.90 96.46 Strong Dem + 14.82 rank 5
12 Bowman, Jamaal D
NY-16
97.94 98.81 98.32 98.39 Strong Dem + 14.61 rank 5
13 Jacobs, Sara D
CA-51
97.73 98.81 98.05 97.90 Strong Dem + 14.40 rank 5
14 Kamlager-Dove, Sydney D
CA-37
97.61 97.61 98.06 98.06 Strong Dem + 14.28 rank 5
15 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-10
97.61 98.02 98.63 97.21 Strong Dem + 14.28 rank 5
16 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
97.52 95.24 98.46 96.60 Strong Dem + 14.19 rank 5
17 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-12
97.23 99.21 97.55 98.55 Strong Dem + 13.90 rank 5
18 Garcia, Robert D
CA-42
97.22 97.22 98.06 98.06 Strong Dem + 13.89 rank 5
19 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.22 97.60 97.53 97.24 Strong Dem + 13.89 rank 5
20 Bush, Cori1 D
MO-1
97.16 97.76 97.80 98.28 Strong Dem + 13.83 rank 5
21 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
97.12 98.80 97.60 98.71 Strong Dem + 13.79 rank 5
22 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
97.10 98.41 98.27 96.95 Strong Dem + 13.77 rank 5
23 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
97.04 99.20 97.27 98.69 Strong Dem + 13.71 rank 5
24 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
96.94 98.02 98.63 97.58 Strong Dem + 13.61 rank 5
25 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.93 97.62 98.35 96.15 Strong Dem + 13.60 rank 5
26 Brown, Shontel D
OH-11
96.89 97.62 96.76 95.99 Strong Dem + 13.56 rank 5
27 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
96.86 95.58 97.84 97.13 Strong Dem + 13.53 rank 5
28 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
96.86 95.63 98.25 96.76 Strong Dem + 13.53 rank 5
29 Crockett, Jasmine D
TX-30
96.83 96.83 96.30 96.30 Strong Dem + 13.50 rank 5
30 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.78 98.81 98.36 98.55 Strong Dem + 13.45 rank 5
31 Chu, Judy D
CA-28
96.75 96.43 98.21 97.74 Strong Dem + 13.42 rank 5
32 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.70 96.80 98.17 98.04 Strong Dem + 13.37 rank 5
33 Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
96.48 96.83 96.92 96.12 Strong Dem + 13.15 rank 5
34 Jackson, Jonathan D
IL-1
96.43 96.43 96.61 96.61 Strong Dem + 13.10 rank 5
35 McGarvey, Morgan D
KY-3
96.03 96.03 95.67 95.67 Strong Dem + 12.70 rank 5
36 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
95.97 96.41 97.84 97.09 Strong Dem + 12.64 rank 5
37 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.95 97.62 97.10 98.38 Strong Dem + 12.62 rank 5
38 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
95.84 95.24 97.34 94.86 Strong Dem + 12.51 rank 5
39 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
95.83 96.41 97.57 96.13 Strong Dem + 12.50 rank 5
40 Grijalva, Raul D
AZ-7
95.79 90.72 97.86 95.40 Strong Dem + 12.46 rank 5
41 Lee, Barbara D
CA-12
95.68 97.98 97.65 98.66 Strong Dem + 12.35 rank 5
42 McClellan, Jennifer D
VA-4
95.65 95.65 95.06 95.06 Strong Dem + 12.32 rank 5
43 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
95.49 95.63 97.55 95.95 Strong Dem + 12.16 rank 5
44 Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila D
FL-20
95.31 96.43 95.89 95.30 Strong Dem + 11.98 rank 5
45 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
95.25 96.43 97.26 96.13 Strong Dem + 11.92 rank 5
46 Ivey, Glenn D
MD-4
95.24 95.24 94.83 94.83 Strong Dem + 11.91 rank 5
47 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-12
95.23 97.62 96.82 97.58 Strong Dem + 11.90 rank 5
48 Takano, Mark D
CA-39
95.13 98.80 97.88 97.74 Strong Dem + 11.80 rank 5
49 Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.07 90.98 97.87 95.21 Strong Dem + 11.74 rank 5
50 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
94.97 96.02 96.99 96.05 Strong Dem + 11.64 rank 5
51 Bonamici, Suzanne1 D
OR-1
94.92 99.57 97.58 98.42 Strong Dem + 11.59 rank 5
52 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
94.80 96.03 97.17 95.48 Strong Dem + 11.47 rank 5
53 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
94.47 96.43 97.78 97.20 Strong Dem + 11.14 rank 5
54 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.82 95.97 97.18 96.26 Strong Dem + 10.49 rank 5
55 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
93.73 94.44 96.98 94.51 Strong Dem + 10.40 rank 5
56 Thanedar, Shri D
MI-13
93.65 93.65 94.05 94.05 Strong Dem + 10.32 rank 5
57 Mullin, Kevin D
CA-15
93.63 93.63 94.52 94.52 Strong Dem + 10.30 rank 5
58 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
93.61 94.40 97.09 95.58 Strong Dem + 10.28 rank 5
59 Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
93.61 89.64 95.77 93.01 Strong Dem + 10.28 rank 5
60 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.60 95.98 97.18 97.35 Strong Dem + 10.27 rank 5
61 Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
93.57 90.73 95.76 93.45 Strong Dem + 10.24 rank 5
62 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.46 96.80 96.19 96.21 Strong Dem + 10.13 rank 5
63 Amo, Gabe D
RI-1
93.33 93.33 91.49 91.49 Strong Dem + 10.00 rank 5
64 Pelosi, Nancy2 D
CA-11
93.29 89.84 94.81 92.68 Strong Dem + 9.96 rank 5
65 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
93.24 97.58 95.84 96.86 Strong Dem + 9.91 rank 5
66 Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
93.20 93.63 95.26 94.29 Strong Dem + 9.87 rank 5
67 Payne, Donald D
NJ-10
93.06 92.56 96.97 94.56 Strong Dem + 9.73 rank 5
68 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-31
93.02 95.18 95.93 95.74 Strong Dem + 9.69 rank 5
69 Carter, Troy D
LA-2
92.92 94.05 95.05 94.48 Strong Dem + 9.59 rank 5
70 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
92.82 95.97 96.85 95.81 Strong Dem + 9.49 rank 5
71 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-6
92.81 97.60 96.97 96.75 Strong Dem + 9.48 rank 5
72 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
92.81 91.57 97.10 94.82 Strong Dem + 9.48 rank 5
73 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
92.60 96.81 96.69 95.81 Strong Dem + 9.27 rank 5
74 Menendez Jr., Rob D
NJ-8
92.46 92.46 93.74 93.74 Strong Dem + 9.13 rank 5
75 Hoyle, Val D
OR-4
92.28 92.28 94.89 94.89 Strong Dem + 8.95 rank 5
76 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
92.25 95.62 94.73 94.97 Strong Dem + 8.92 rank 5
77 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
92.20 97.22 96.69 96.46 Strong Dem + 8.87 rank 5
78 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
91.55 97.62 95.19 96.45 Strong Dem + 8.22 rank 5
79 Matsui, Doris D
CA-7
91.30 95.62 96.34 95.14 Strong Dem + 7.97 rank 5
80 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
91.30 95.20 96.72 95.11 Strong Dem + 7.97 rank 5
81 Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
91.27 90.32 94.40 92.86 Strong Dem + 7.94 rank 5
82 Lieu, Ted D
CA-36
90.75 92.86 96.21 94.29 Strong Dem + 7.42 rank 5
83 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.60 89.11 95.97 92.44 Strong Dem + 7.27 rank 5
84 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
90.57 96.43 94.45 96.64 Strong Dem + 7.24 rank 5
85 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
90.50 95.62 96.30 96.41 Strong Dem + 7.17 rank 5
86 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
90.42 94.82 95.81 95.30 Strong Dem + 7.09 rank 5
87 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
90.36 92.80 96.22 95.10 Strong Dem + 7.03 rank 5
88 Castro, Joaquin1 D
TX-20
90.10 99.58 96.00 98.07 Strong Dem + 6.77 rank 5
89 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
89.97 92.86 95.90 94.48 Strong Dem + 6.64 rank 5
90 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
89.90 95.24 95.22 95.64 Strong Dem + 6.57 rank 5
91 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
89.87 96.81 95.73 95.69 Strong Dem + 6.54 rank 5
92 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
89.30 89.16 95.53 92.83 Strong Dem + 5.97 rank 5
93 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-37
88.77 96.81 93.14 97.06 Strong Dem + 5.44 rank 5
94 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
88.46 94.02 93.69 94.86 Strong Dem + 5.13 rank 5
95 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
88.40 92.86 93.70 94.17 Strong Dem + 5.07 rank 5
96 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
88.26 93.25 95.84 94.92 Strong Dem + 4.93 rank 5
97 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-18
88.18 92.77 92.91 94.70 Strong Dem + 4.85 rank 5
98 Goldman, Dan D
NY-10
88.10 88.10 92.78 92.78 Strong Dem + 4.77 rank 5
99 Vargas, Juan D
CA-52
87.95 97.21 95.13 96.28 Strong Dem + 4.62 rank 5
100 Carson, André D
IN-7
87.91 95.62 95.32 96.12 Strong Dem + 4.58 rank 5
101 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
87.72 93.25 95.17 94.04 Strong Dem + 4.39 rank 5
102 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
87.69 90.87 94.63 92.78 Strong Dem + 4.36 rank 5
103 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-16
87.54 93.63 93.21 94.66 Strong Dem + 4.21 rank 5
104 McBath, Lucy D
GA-7
87.52 94.05 94.45 94.33 Strong Dem + 4.19 rank 5
105 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
87.35 93.25 94.73 94.52 Strong Dem + 4.02 rank 5
106 Frankel, Lois D
FL-22
87.25 87.60 95.13 91.58 Strong Dem + 3.92 rank 5
107 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
87.00 96.02 93.20 95.61 Strong Dem + 3.67 rank 5
108 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
86.96 90.87 94.63 93.26 Strong Dem + 3.63 rank 5
109 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
86.87 85.94 94.39 90.85 Strong Dem + 3.54 rank 5
110 Pettersen, Brittany D
CO-7
86.85 86.85 91.47 91.47 Strong Dem + 3.52 rank 5
111 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
86.73 92.77 94.84 93.50 Strong Dem + 3.40 rank 5
112 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
86.68 97.22 92.81 96.78 Strong Dem + 3.35 rank 5
113 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
86.58 96.81 94.86 96.24 Strong Dem + 3.25 rank 5
114 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
86.54 90.28 94.37 93.23 Strong Dem + 3.21 rank 5
115 Salinas, Andrea D
OR-6
86.45 86.45 91.72 91.72 Strong Dem + 3.12 rank 5
116 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
86.42 92.06 95.00 93.72 Strong Dem + 3.09 rank 5
117 Larson, John D
CT-1
86.41 90.32 93.36 93.63 Strong Dem + 3.08 rank 5
118 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.33 80.69 92.30 87.84 Strong Dem + 3.00 rank 5
119 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-3
86.04 73.88 95.06 85.21 Strong Dem + 2.71 rank 5
120 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
85.94 91.24 94.41 93.44 Strong Dem + 2.61 rank 5
121 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
85.73 88.05 94.78 91.71 Strong Dem + 2.40 rank 5
122 Magaziner, Seth D
RI-2
85.48 85.48 91.23 91.23 Strong Dem + 2.15 rank 5
123 Schiff, Adam D
CA-30
85.08 92.21 93.36 94.09 Strong Dem + 1.75 rank 5
124 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
84.77 93.65 92.64 94.80 Strong Dem + 1.44 rank 5
125 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-14
84.52 86.01 94.30 90.67 Strong Dem + 1.19 rank 5
126 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
84.35 89.29 93.87 92.60 Strong Dem + 1.02 rank 5
127 Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
84.10 84.65 94.00 91.10 Strong Dem + 0.77 rank 5
128 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-25
84.01 89.68 93.93 92.43 Strong Dem + 0.68 rank 5
129 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
83.86 89.68 93.70 92.86 Strong Dem + 0.53 rank 5
130 Thompson, Mike D
CA-4
83.77 90.48 92.41 92.94 Strong Dem + 0.44 rank 5
131 Sherman, Brad D
CA-32
83.70 92.83 91.49 93.53 Strong Dem + 0.37 rank 5
132 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
83.68 83.73 92.22 86.89 Strong Dem + 0.35 rank 5
133 Manning, Kathy D
NC-6
83.68 77.69 90.83 86.80 Strong Dem + 0.35 rank 5
134 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
83.66 94.82 91.67 94.96 Strong Dem + 0.33 rank 5
135 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
83.51 95.24 91.64 95.16 Strong Dem + 0.18 rank 5
136 Garamendi, John D
CA-8
83.15 93.23 93.09 93.39 Strong Dem - 0.18 rank 5
137 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
82.99 84.06 91.34 87.30 Strong Dem - 0.34 rank 5
138 Jackson, Jeff D
NC-14
82.94 82.94 89.73 89.73 Strong Dem - 0.39 rank 5
139 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
82.72 94.44 93.96 94.86 Strong Dem - 0.61 rank 5
140 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
82.69 88.76 92.23 91.43 Strong Dem - 0.64 rank 5
141 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
82.52 93.23 91.18 94.02 Strong Dem - 0.81 rank 5
142 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
82.29 84.55 93.87 90.42 Strong Dem - 1.04 rank 5
143 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
82.17 88.10 93.49 91.45 Strong Dem - 1.16 rank 5
144 Green, Al D
TX-9
81.91 93.63 93.27 94.66 Strong Dem - 1.42 rank 5
145 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-19
81.38 82.54 92.87 88.76 Strong Dem - 1.95 rank 5
146 Budzinski, Nikki D
IL-13
81.35 81.35 88.44 88.44 Strong Dem - 1.98 rank 5
147 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
81.25 82.87 92.25 88.73 Strong Dem - 2.08 rank 5
148 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
80.72 88.10 92.60 89.23 Strong Dem - 2.61 rank 5
149 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
80.44 88.89 91.85 92.37 Strong Dem - 2.89 rank 5
150 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
79.55 83.33 91.66 89.37 Strong Dem - 3.78 rank 5
151 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
79.44 87.25 92.99 91.73 Strong Dem - 3.89 rank 5
152 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
79.31 89.52 89.77 92.04 Strong Dem - 4.02 rank 5
153 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-33
79.07 94.44 92.79 94.52 Strong Dem - 4.26 rank 5
154 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
78.50 93.65 92.32 94.92 Strong Dem - 4.83 rank 5
155 Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
78.46 68.67 91.55 81.01 Strong Dem - 4.87 rank 5
156 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
78.23 90.76 90.85 93.23 Strong Dem - 5.10 rank 5
157 González, Vicente D
TX-34
77.39 80.40 88.63 82.73 Strong Dem - 5.94 rank 5
158 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
77.07 92.06 92.12 93.86 Strong Dem - 6.26 rank 5
159 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
76.41 87.65 90.63 91.76 Strong Dem - 6.92 rank 5
160 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
76.35 95.22 88.25 95.45 Strong Dem - 6.98 rank 5
161 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
75.76 90.87 91.21 93.21 Strong Dem - 7.57 rank 5
162 Case, Ed D
HI-1
75.17 84.52 86.01 89.86 Strong Dem - 8.16 rank 5
163 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
74.75 88.05 90.43 91.51 Strong Dem - 8.58 rank 5
164 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-25
73.27 92.86 90.25 93.88 Strong Dem - 10.06 rank 5
165 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
72.45 84.80 88.73 90.21 Strong Dem - 10.88 rank 5
166 Scott, David D
GA-13
72.39 87.65 88.96 90.72 Strong Dem - 10.94 rank 5
167 Bera, Ami D
CA-6
71.51 89.68 89.85 92.75 Strong Dem - 11.82 rank 5
168 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
71.40 91.60 89.00 93.65 Strong Dem - 11.93 rank 5
169 Peters, Scott D
CA-50
67.84 86.51 87.02 91.13 Strong Dem - 15.49 rank 5
170 Costa, Jim D
CA-21
53.05 78.23 76.48 84.17 Strong Dem - 30.28 rank 5
171 Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
94.65 93.25 95.91 94.21 Leans Dem + 14.65 rank 5
172 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
91.13 93.60 95.89 94.49 Leans Dem + 11.13 rank 5
173 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
90.97 88.49 96.01 92.77 Leans Dem + 10.97 rank 5
174 Deluzio, Chris D
PA-17
88.89 88.89 91.33 91.33 Leans Dem + 8.89 rank 5
175 Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
85.80 81.75 92.00 89.01 Leans Dem + 5.80 rank 5
176 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
85.75 85.60 94.44 90.50 Leans Dem + 5.75 rank 5
177 Trone, David D
MD-6
85.59 86.45 93.97 91.26 Leans Dem + 5.59 rank 5
178 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-4
84.29 81.05 93.24 87.62 Leans Dem + 4.29 rank 5
179 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
83.25 88.80 94.26 92.48 Leans Dem + 3.25 rank 5
180 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
82.27 82.87 93.01 90.21 Leans Dem + 2.27 rank 5
181 Scholten, Hilary D
MI-3
81.35 81.35 88.67 88.67 Leans Dem + 1.35 rank 5
182 Sorensen, Eric D
IL-17
80.56 80.56 87.92 87.92 Leans Dem + 0.56 rank 5
183 Vasquez, Gabe D
NM-2
80.16 80.16 86.82 86.82 Leans Dem + 0.16 rank 5
184 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
79.63 86.11 93.22 91.13 Leans Dem - 0.37 rank 5
185 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
79.20 76.19 90.75 83.63 Leans Dem - 0.80 rank 5
186 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
78.50 79.44 90.71 85.13 Leans Dem - 1.50 rank 5
187 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
76.92 87.50 92.07 91.54 Leans Dem - 3.08 rank 5
188 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
75.13 78.00 88.41 82.21 Leans Dem - 4.87 rank 5
189 Moskowitz, Jared D
FL-23
74.00 74.00 84.02 84.02 Leans Dem - 6.00 rank 5
190 Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
73.14 80.16 88.73 87.56 Leans Dem - 6.86 rank 5
191 Davis, Don D
NC-1
69.32 69.32 76.78 76.78 Leans Dem - 10.68 rank 5
192 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
65.88 74.00 84.71 84.65 Leans Dem - 14.12 rank 5
193 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
62.81 90.08 80.70 91.61 Leans Dem - 17.19 rank 5
194 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
49.09 73.02 75.77 77.49 Leans Dem - 30.91 rank 5
195 Chavez-DeRemer, Lori R
OR-5
10.36 10.36 27.49 27.49 Leans Dem - 69.64 rank 5
196 Garcia, Mike R
CA-27
1.98 1.19 10.66 12.86 Leans Dem - 78.02 rank 5
197 D'Esposito, Anthony R
NY-4
0.80 0.80 20.63 20.63 Leans Dem - 79.20 rank 5
198 Kildee, Dan1 D
MI-8
89.69 86.69 95.99 91.71 Swing + 13.02 rank 5
199 Porter, Katie D
CA-47
88.77 91.84 95.33 94.88 Swing + 12.10 rank 5
200 Sykes, Emilia D
OH-13
88.10 88.10 92.23 92.23 Swing + 11.43 rank 5
201 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
87.87 86.90 94.91 91.49 Swing + 11.20 rank 5
202 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
82.50 82.94 92.79 89.09 Swing + 5.83 rank 5
203 Nickel III, Wiley D
NC-13
81.35 81.35 87.40 87.40 Swing + 4.68 rank 5
204 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
80.24 80.00 91.84 87.25 Swing + 3.57 rank 5
205 Harder, Josh D
CA-9
79.86 77.78 91.86 87.11 Swing + 3.19 rank 5
206 Ryan, Pat D
NY-18
79.78 78.97 87.55 86.50 Swing + 3.11 rank 5
207 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
79.69 78.57 91.49 85.71 Swing + 3.02 rank 5
208 Landsman, Greg D
OH-1
78.17 78.17 85.76 85.76 Swing + 1.50 rank 5
209 Caraveo, Yadira D
CO-8
76.92 76.92 84.23 84.23 Swing + 0.25 rank 5
210 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-7
75.30 80.16 89.46 88.28 Swing - 1.37 rank 5
211 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
73.90 58.82 90.85 64.71 Swing - 2.77 rank 5
212 Fitzpatrick, Brian R
PA-1
23.48 28.17 35.40 41.09 Swing - 53.19 rank 5
213 Schweikert, Dave R
AZ-1
7.12 2.78 4.91 6.14 Swing - 69.55 rank 5
214 Lawler, Mike R
NY-17
5.58 5.58 26.37 26.37 Swing - 71.09 rank 5
215 Kean Jr., Tom R
NJ-7
4.76 4.76 25.36 25.36 Swing - 71.91 rank 5
216 Nunn, Zachary R
IA-3
4.37 4.37 17.38 17.38 Swing - 72.30 rank 5
217 Molinaro, Marc R
NY-19
3.97 3.97 20.88 20.88 Swing - 72.70 rank 5
218 Valadao, David R
CA-22
3.66 0.81 10.31 20.78 Swing - 73.01 rank 5
219 Bacon, Don R
NE-2
3.31 1.98 12.69 22.03 Swing - 73.36 rank 5
220 Duarte, John R
CA-13
2.39 2.39 10.48 10.48 Swing - 74.28 rank 5
221 Kiggans, Jen R
VA-2
2.00 2.00 20.36 20.36 Swing - 74.67 rank 5
222 James, John R
MI-10
1.99 1.99 18.58 18.58 Swing - 74.68 rank 5
223 Steele, Michelle R
CA-45
1.44 1.20 10.89 14.49 Swing - 75.23 rank 5
224 Williams, Brandon R
NY-22
0.80 0.80 11.87 11.87 Swing - 75.87 rank 5
225 Ciscomani, Juan R
AZ-6
0.00 0.00 19.45 19.45 Swing - 76.67 rank 5
226 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
84.23 84.13 94.18 89.34 Leans Rep + 10.90 rank 5
227 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
77.61 79.37 88.76 87.66 Leans Rep + 4.28 rank 5
228 Peltola, Mary5 D
AK-AL
74.32 72.95 78.16 75.91 Leans Rep + 0.99 rank 5
229 Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie D
WA-3
71.83 71.83 74.07 74.07 Leans Rep - 1.50 rank 5
230 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
65.04 70.00 80.08 70.49 Leans Rep - 8.29 rank 5
231 Perry, Scott R
PA-10
6.94 2.78 3.79 3.26 Leans Rep - 66.39 rank 5
232 Crane, Eli R
AZ-2
5.95 5.95 5.01 5.01 Leans Rep - 67.38 rank 5
233 Van Drew, Jeff R
NJ-2
5.39 1.19 29.01 4.36 Leans Rep - 67.94 rank 5
234 Zinke, Ryan R
MT-1
4.68 1.98 6.11 6.27 Leans Rep - 68.65 rank 5
235 Boebert, Lauren R
CO-3
4.15 4.02 4.47 3.81 Leans Rep - 69.18 rank 5
236 Turner, Mike R
OH-10
4.02 3.64 11.75 21.13 Leans Rep - 69.31 rank 5
237 Huizenga, Bill R
MI-4
3.40 0.40 3.27 5.34 Leans Rep - 69.93 rank 5
238 Wittman, Rob R
VA-1
3.37 0.00 4.62 3.23 Leans Rep - 69.96 rank 5
239 Luna, Anna R
FL-13
3.25 3.25 4.03 4.03 Leans Rep - 70.08 rank 5
240 Steil, Bryan R
WI-1
2.43 0.40 6.66 6.32 Leans Rep - 70.90 rank 5
241 Carey, Mike R
OH-15
2.26 2.38 6.63 6.62 Leans Rep - 71.07 rank 5
242 Gonzales, Tony R
TX-23
2.07 2.01 10.83 12.11 Leans Rep - 71.26 rank 5
243 Van Orden, Derrick R
WI-3
1.98 1.98 10.66 10.66 Leans Rep - 71.35 rank 5
244 Salazar, Maria R
FL-27
1.68 1.22 16.71 17.98 Leans Rep - 71.65 rank 5
245 Kiley, Kevin R
CA-3
1.59 1.59 21.67 21.67 Leans Rep - 71.74 rank 5
246 LaLota, Nick R
NY-1
1.59 1.59 19.55 19.55 Leans Rep - 71.74 rank 5
247 Calvert, Ken R
CA-41
1.46 0.00 6.83 17.68 Leans Rep - 71.87 rank 5
248 Miller-Meeks, Mariannette R
IA-1
1.44 1.59 11.06 12.32 Leans Rep - 71.89 rank 5
249 Hinson, Ashley R
IA-2
0.82 0.00 11.77 15.05 Leans Rep - 72.51 rank 5
250 De la Cruz-Hernandez, Monica R
TX-15
0.40 0.40 5.31 5.31 Leans Rep - 72.93 rank 5
251 Massie, Thomas R
KY-4
20.59 11.55 12.54 8.46 Strong Rep - 49.41 rank 5
252 Smith, Chris R
NJ-4
14.65 3.57 20.60 15.24 Strong Rep - 55.35 rank 5
253 Griffith, Morgan R
VA-9
11.78 4.40 7.22 6.19 Strong Rep - 58.22 rank 5
254 McClintock, Tom R
CA-5
10.63 4.37 5.22 4.03 Strong Rep - 59.37 rank 5
255 Biggs, Andy R
AZ-5
9.52 8.73 5.57 6.27 Strong Rep - 60.48 rank 5
256 Mace, Nancy R
SC-1
8.45 10.76 15.17 18.71 Strong Rep - 61.55 rank 5
257 Gaetz, Matt R
FL-1
8.04 8.73 7.84 7.11 Strong Rep - 61.96 rank 5
258 Stefanik, Elise R
NY-21
7.70 0.79 13.10 5.30 Strong Rep - 62.30 rank 5
259 Posey, Bill R
FL-8
7.33 2.79 5.81 3.62 Strong Rep - 62.67 rank 5
260 Gosar, Paul R
AZ-9
6.62 3.24 4.58 3.85 Strong Rep - 63.38 rank 5
261 Diaz-Balart, Mario R
FL-26
6.27 0.00 11.69 15.53 Strong Rep - 63.73 rank 5
262 Roy, Chip R
TX-21
6.12 4.40 5.92 4.23 Strong Rep - 63.88 rank 5
263 Davidson, Warren R
OH-8
6.10 2.39 4.07 3.06 Strong Rep - 63.90 rank 5
264 Buchanan, Vern R
FL-16
5.85 0.40 8.62 8.65 Strong Rep - 64.15 rank 5
265 Harris, Andy R
MD-1
5.82 2.78 3.97 2.89 Strong Rep - 64.18 rank 5
266 Burchett, Tim R
TN-2
5.21 6.75 4.13 4.82 Strong Rep - 64.79 rank 5
267 Mast, Brian R
FL-21
4.99 2.40 7.79 3.73 Strong Rep - 65.01 rank 5
268 Joyce, David R
OH-14
4.98 2.02 11.88 19.51 Strong Rep - 65.02 rank 5
269 Rosendale, Matt R
MT-2
4.94 6.75 4.65 5.14 Strong Rep - 65.06 rank 5
270 Mooney, Alex R
WV-2
4.80 1.22 3.65 1.81 Strong Rep - 65.20 rank 5
271 Jordan, Jim R
OH-4
4.70 2.79 2.36 1.94 Strong Rep - 65.30 rank 5
272 Bishop, Dan R
NC-8
4.58 3.63 3.33 4.15 Strong Rep - 65.42 rank 5
273 Duncan, Jeff R
SC-3
4.45 2.40 2.72 1.61 Strong Rep - 65.55 rank 5
274 Greene, Marjorie R
GA-14
4.34 4.38 4.37 3.95 Strong Rep - 65.66 rank 5
275 Burgess, Mike R
TX-26
4.21 0.79 4.01 4.51 Strong Rep - 65.79 rank 5
276 Comer, James R
KY-1
4.00 2.78 2.60 2.25 Strong Rep - 66.00 rank 5
277 Good, Bob R
VA-5
3.95 4.80 4.05 4.36 Strong Rep - 66.05 rank 5
278 Grothman, Glenn R
WI-6
3.90 0.80 2.91 1.62 Strong Rep - 66.10 rank 5
279 Cloud, Michael R
TX-27
3.84 2.78 2.96 2.74 Strong Rep - 66.16 rank 5
280 Thompson, Glenn R
PA-15
3.81 1.19 8.83 14.52 Strong Rep - 66.19 rank 5
281 Simpson, Mike R
ID-2
3.68 1.19 9.79 19.80 Strong Rep - 66.32 rank 5
282 Norman, Ralph R
SC-5
3.57 2.79 2.23 3.27 Strong Rep - 66.43 rank 5
283 Graves, Garret R
LA-6
3.53 1.59 5.28 8.39 Strong Rep - 66.47 rank 5
284 Emmer, Tom R
MN-6
3.31 1.59 4.63 2.41 Strong Rep - 66.69 rank 5
285 Spartz, Victoria R
IN-5
3.31 4.40 4.72 4.91 Strong Rep - 66.69 rank 5
286 Newhouse, Dan R
WA-4
3.20 1.20 8.90 16.89 Strong Rep - 66.80 rank 5
287 Bost, Mike R
IL-12
3.20 1.59 6.81 3.05 Strong Rep - 66.80 rank 5
288 Brecheen, Josh R
OK-2
3.19 3.19 2.90 2.90 Strong Rep - 66.81 rank 5
289 Burlison, Eric R
MO-7
3.17 3.17 2.90 2.90 Strong Rep - 66.83 rank 5
290 Fry, Russell R
SC-7
3.17 3.17 4.03 4.03 Strong Rep - 66.83 rank 5
291 Bilirakis, Gus R
FL-12
3.15 3.17 5.66 4.52 Strong Rep - 66.85 rank 5
292 Rogers, Mike R
AL-3
3.15 1.19 6.70 8.27 Strong Rep - 66.85 rank 5
293 Cole, Tom R
OK-4
2.98 0.79 8.30 18.49 Strong Rep - 67.02 rank 5
294 Higgins, Clay R
LA-3
2.96 2.38 2.36 2.28 Strong Rep - 67.04 rank 5
295 Cline, Ben R
VA-6
2.95 2.78 2.29 2.25 Strong Rep - 67.05 rank 5
296 Webster, Dan R
FL-11
2.89 1.59 3.78 3.48 Strong Rep - 67.11 rank 5
297 Maloy, Celeste R
UT-2
2.86 2.86 4.31 4.31 Strong Rep - 67.14 rank 5
298 DesJarlais, Scott R
TN-4
2.84 1.61 2.65 2.61 Strong Rep - 67.16 rank 5
299 Ogles IV, Andy R
TN-5
2.80 2.80 2.95 2.95 Strong Rep - 67.20 rank 5
300 Bean, Aaron R
FL-4
2.78 2.78 2.25 2.25 Strong Rep - 67.22 rank 5
301 Collins, Mike R
GA-10
2.78 2.78 2.74 2.74 Strong Rep - 67.22 rank 5
302 Hageman, Harriet R
WY-AL
2.78 2.78 2.57 2.57 Strong Rep - 67.22 rank 5
303 Bergman, Jack R
MI-1
2.76 0.79 5.33 6.14 Strong Rep - 67.24 rank 5
304 Foxx, Virginia R
NC-5
2.68 1.59 2.58 3.23 Strong Rep - 67.32 rank 5
305 Steube, Greg R
FL-17
2.65 2.47 2.62 2.68 Strong Rep - 67.35 rank 5
306 Loudermilk, Barry R
GA-11
2.64 1.60 1.58 1.80 Strong Rep - 67.36 rank 5
307 Amodei, Mark R
NV-2
2.64 0.00 6.14 9.50 Strong Rep - 67.36 rank 5
308 Weber, Randy R
TX-14
2.62 2.38 1.85 1.77 Strong Rep - 67.38 rank 5
309 Stauber, Pete R
MN-8
2.60 1.19 9.96 4.55 Strong Rep - 67.40 rank 5
310 Tiffany, Tom R
WI-7
2.59 2.78 2.44 2.42 Strong Rep - 67.41 rank 5
311 Aderholt, Robert R
AL-4
2.59 0.79 5.96 6.18 Strong Rep - 67.41 rank 5
312 Rogers, Hal R
KY-5
2.59 0.40 7.77 17.13 Strong Rep - 67.41 rank 5
313 Graves, Sam R
MO-6
2.51 1.59 3.93 5.64 Strong Rep - 67.49 rank 5
314 Armstrong, Kelly R
ND-AL
2.44 1.60 6.74 8.93 Strong Rep - 67.56 rank 5
315 Langworthy, Nick R
NY-23
2.42 2.42 7.21 7.21 Strong Rep - 67.58 rank 5
316 Miller, Max R
OH-7
2.42 2.42 10.02 10.02 Strong Rep - 67.58 rank 5
317 Gallagher, Mike R
WI-8
2.36 0.80 5.69 4.36 Strong Rep - 67.64 rank 5
318 McMorris Rodgers, Cathy R
WA-5
2.31 0.40 4.11 3.61 Strong Rep - 67.69 rank 5
319 Malliotakis, Nicole R
NY-11
2.29 2.43 10.96 9.18 Strong Rep - 67.71 rank 5
320 Curtis, John R
UT-3
2.28 2.39 5.54 10.75 Strong Rep - 67.72 rank 5
321 Nehls, Troy R
TX-22
2.28 2.79 2.24 2.66 Strong Rep - 67.72 rank 5
322 Kim, Young R
CA-40
2.27 1.99 17.54 21.65 Strong Rep - 67.73 rank 5
323 Finstad, Brad R
MN-1
2.26 2.39 2.35 2.10 Strong Rep - 67.74 rank 5
324 Gooden, Lance R
TX-5
2.25 1.98 2.03 1.77 Strong Rep - 67.75 rank 5
325 Hill, French R
AR-2
2.15 0.40 4.40 8.21 Strong Rep - 67.85 rank 5
326 McCaul, Michael R
TX-10
2.09 0.80 4.93 10.55 Strong Rep - 67.91 rank 5
327 Hunt, Wesley R
TX-38
2.07 2.07 2.64 2.64 Strong Rep - 67.93 rank 5
328 Palmer, Gary R
AL-6
2.05 1.60 1.24 1.62 Strong Rep - 67.95 rank 5
329 Granger, Kay R
TX-12
2.02 0.00 5.31 10.39 Strong Rep - 67.98 rank 5
330 Issa, Darrell R
CA-48
2.02 3.17 3.71 6.02 Strong Rep - 67.98 rank 5
331 LaMalfa, Doug R
CA-1
2.00 1.99 2.60 2.46 Strong Rep - 68.00 rank 5
332 Mills, Cory R
FL-7
1.99 1.99 3.07 3.07 Strong Rep - 68.01 rank 5
333 Scott, Austin R
GA-8
1.99 0.79 2.85 10.29 Strong Rep - 68.01 rank 5
334 Self, Keith R
TX-3
1.98 1.98 2.25 2.25 Strong Rep - 68.02 rank 5
335 Johnson, Mike4 R
LA-4
1.95 0.99 1.93 0.86 Strong Rep - 68.05 rank 5
336 Lucas, Frank R
OK-3
1.95 0.00 5.77 18.20 Strong Rep - 68.05 rank 5
337 Smith, Jason R
MO-8
1.94 1.20 1.69 2.94 Strong Rep - 68.06 rank 5
338 Arrington , Jodey R
TX-19
1.94 1.98 2.03 3.75 Strong Rep - 68.06 rank 5
339 Waltz, Michael R
FL-6
1.92 0.00 5.99 1.52 Strong Rep - 68.08 rank 5
340 Yakym III, Rudy R
IN-2
1.92 1.98 4.29 4.17 Strong Rep - 68.08 rank 5
341 Crawford, Rick R
AR-1
1.86 1.59 4.07 6.47 Strong Rep - 68.14 rank 5
342 Miller, Mary R
IL-15
1.86 2.78 2.77 2.73 Strong Rep - 68.14 rank 5
343 Donalds, Byron R
FL-19
1.85 2.38 2.13 2.58 Strong Rep - 68.15 rank 5
344 Mann, Tracey R
KS-1
1.85 2.78 2.43 3.53 Strong Rep - 68.15 rank 5
345 Moore, Barry R
AL-2
1.85 3.17 1.94 2.41 Strong Rep - 68.15 rank 5
346 Hudson, Richard R
NC-9
1.83 0.40 2.98 5.07 Strong Rep - 68.17 rank 5
347 Banks, Jim R
IN-3
1.80 1.59 1.70 2.92 Strong Rep - 68.20 rank 5
348 Smucker, Lloyd R
PA-11
1.80 1.20 4.15 4.83 Strong Rep - 68.20 rank 5
349 Womack, Steve R
AR-3
1.78 0.79 6.55 17.82 Strong Rep - 68.22 rank 5
350 Lamborn, Doug R
CO-5
1.76 0.40 1.41 2.10 Strong Rep - 68.24 rank 5
351 Tenney, Claudia R
NY-24
1.76 0.79 4.27 3.87 Strong Rep - 68.24 rank 5
352 Fulcher, Russ R
ID-1
1.74 1.19 1.77 1.93 Strong Rep - 68.26 rank 5
353 Kelly, Mike R
PA-16
1.73 0.00 6.05 12.13 Strong Rep - 68.27 rank 5
354 Wilson, Joe R
SC-2
1.71 0.40 2.30 3.55 Strong Rep - 68.29 rank 5
355 Wenstrup, Brad R
OH-2
1.71 0.00 2.57 4.50 Strong Rep - 68.29 rank 5
356 Moolenaar, John R
MI-2
1.70 2.38 4.48 7.06 Strong Rep - 68.30 rank 5
357 Garbarino, Andrew R
NY-2
1.66 1.20 17.51 20.95 Strong Rep - 68.34 rank 5
358 Cammack, Kat R
FL-3
1.65 2.40 2.64 2.46 Strong Rep - 68.35 rank 5
359 Obernolte, Jay R
CA-23
1.65 0.40 14.19 18.02 Strong Rep - 68.35 rank 5
360 Walberg, Timothy R
MI-5
1.61 0.00 2.78 6.27 Strong Rep - 68.39 rank 5
361 Luttrell, Morgan R
TX-8
1.59 1.59 1.94 1.94 Strong Rep - 68.41 rank 5
362 Scalise, Steve R
LA-1
1.58 0.41 1.74 1.89 Strong Rep - 68.42 rank 5
363 Green, Mark R
TN-7
1.57 2.00 1.63 1.79 Strong Rep - 68.43 rank 5
364 Carter, John R
TX-31
1.55 0.00 4.24 8.44 Strong Rep - 68.45 rank 5
365 McHenry, Patrick R
NC-10
1.55 0.41 2.92 4.95 Strong Rep - 68.45 rank 5
366 Barr, Andy R
KY-6
1.53 0.00 3.20 4.67 Strong Rep - 68.47 rank 5
367 Rouzer, David R
NC-7
1.47 0.00 2.08 2.42 Strong Rep - 68.53 rank 5
368 Clyde, Andrew R
GA-9
1.44 1.98 1.52 1.94 Strong Rep - 68.56 rank 5
369 Fitzgerald, Scott R
WI-5
1.44 2.38 1.43 1.77 Strong Rep - 68.56 rank 5
370 Fischbach, Michelle R
MN-7
1.44 2.38 2.10 2.26 Strong Rep - 68.56 rank 5
371 Harshbarger, Diana R
TN-1
1.44 2.78 1.43 2.25 Strong Rep - 68.56 rank 5
372 Crenshaw, Dan R
TX-2
1.39 0.80 6.92 9.09 Strong Rep - 68.61 rank 5
373 Meuser, Dan R
PA-9
1.39 1.60 4.45 6.05 Strong Rep - 68.61 rank 5
374 LaHood, Darin R
IL-16
1.37 0.40 3.78 7.79 Strong Rep - 68.63 rank 5
375 Wagner, Ann R
MO-2
1.36 0.00 5.65 15.26 Strong Rep - 68.64 rank 5
376 Westerman, Bruce R
AR-4
1.36 1.59 1.72 3.86 Strong Rep - 68.64 rank 5
377 Bucshon, Larry R
IN-8
1.32 0.40 5.58 17.24 Strong Rep - 68.68 rank 5
378 Fleischmann, Chuck R
TN-3
1.26 1.98 4.76 17.23 Strong Rep - 68.74 rank 5
379 Babin, Brian R
TX-36
1.26 0.81 1.02 0.81 Strong Rep - 68.74 rank 5
380 Ferguson, Drew R
GA-3
1.24 1.19 2.18 4.02 Strong Rep - 68.76 rank 5
381 Fallon, Pat R
TX-4
1.24 1.98 1.28 1.64 Strong Rep - 68.76 rank 5
382 Moore, Blake R
UT-1
1.23 1.19 10.65 14.08 Strong Rep - 68.77 rank 5
383 Owens, Burgess R
UT-4
1.23 1.98 6.40 8.52 Strong Rep - 68.77 rank 5
384 Smith, Adrian R
NE-3
1.23 0.00 2.23 4.19 Strong Rep - 68.77 rank 5
385 Kelly, Trent R
MS-1
1.20 0.00 1.27 1.28 Strong Rep - 68.80 rank 5
386 Williams, Roger R
TX-25
1.19 0.40 1.53 0.85 Strong Rep - 68.81 rank 5
387 Carter, Buddy R
GA-1
1.14 0.40 2.05 3.54 Strong Rep - 68.86 rank 5
388 Guthrie, Brett R
KY-2
1.09 0.00 4.36 7.22 Strong Rep - 68.91 rank 5
389 Pence, Greg R
IN-6
1.05 0.00 4.99 8.30 Strong Rep - 68.95 rank 5
390 Timmons, William R
SC-4
1.05 1.59 1.49 1.77 Strong Rep - 68.95 rank 5
391 Miller, Carol R
WV-1
1.05 1.20 2.43 1.79 Strong Rep - 68.95 rank 5
392 Johnson, Dusty R
SD-AL
1.04 0.40 4.13 3.70 Strong Rep - 68.96 rank 5
393 Hern, Kevin R
OK-1
1.03 0.79 1.30 1.61 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
394 Bentz, Cliff R
OR-2
1.03 1.59 4.37 5.95 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
395 Luetkemeyer, Blaine R
MO-3
0.97 0.41 3.46 4.93 Strong Rep - 69.03 rank 5
396 Rutherford, John R
FL-5
0.97 0.40 6.04 6.95 Strong Rep - 69.03 rank 5
397 Sessions, Pete R
TX-17
0.97 0.00 1.65 2.86 Strong Rep - 69.03 rank 5
398 Allen, Rick R
GA-12
0.91 1.19 0.94 2.42 Strong Rep - 69.09 rank 5
399 Reschenthaler, Guy R
PA-14
0.87 0.79 5.50 2.57 Strong Rep - 69.13 rank 5
400 Guest, Michael R
MS-3
0.87 0.80 3.01 3.55 Strong Rep - 69.13 rank 5
401 Baird, Jim R
IN-4
0.87 1.59 7.45 15.62 Strong Rep - 69.13 rank 5
402 Latta, Bob R
OH-5
0.87 0.40 1.91 5.30 Strong Rep - 69.13 rank 5
403 Van Duyne, Beth R
TX-24
0.83 1.20 1.44 1.30 Strong Rep - 69.17 rank 5
404 Giménez, Carlos R
FL-28
0.83 0.00 11.05 11.20 Strong Rep - 69.17 rank 5
405 Feenstra, Randy R
IA-4
0.82 0.40 3.95 4.65 Strong Rep - 69.18 rank 5
406 Alford, Mark R
MO-4
0.79 0.79 2.09 2.09 Strong Rep - 69.21 rank 5
407 Lee, Laurel R
FL-15
0.79 0.79 12.08 12.08 Strong Rep - 69.21 rank 5
408 Rose, John R
TN-6
0.70 0.00 1.83 2.43 Strong Rep - 69.30 rank 5
409 Flood, Mike R
NE-1
0.67 0.79 11.18 13.04 Strong Rep - 69.33 rank 5
410 Murphy, Greg R
NC-3
0.57 0.40 3.84 5.02 Strong Rep - 69.43 rank 5
411 Estes, Ron R
KS-4
0.57 0.40 1.22 1.61 Strong Rep - 69.43 rank 5
412 Dunn, Neal R
FL-2
0.56 0.40 3.67 7.27 Strong Rep - 69.44 rank 5
413 Ellzey, Jake R
TX-6
0.52 0.40 7.39 10.16 Strong Rep - 69.48 rank 5
414 Joyce, John R
PA-13
0.52 0.79 2.20 2.89 Strong Rep - 69.48 rank 5
415 Balderson, Troy R
OH-12
0.51 0.40 4.26 4.49 Strong Rep - 69.49 rank 5
416 Lesko, Debbie R
AZ-8
0.49 0.00 1.66 1.42 Strong Rep - 69.51 rank 5
417 Jackson, Ronny R
TX-13
0.42 0.80 0.69 0.81 Strong Rep - 69.58 rank 5
418 Kustoff, David R
TN-8
0.42 0.00 2.51 5.75 Strong Rep - 69.58 rank 5
419 Bice, Stephanie R
OK-5
0.41 0.40 7.56 10.47 Strong Rep - 69.59 rank 5
420 Edwards, Chuck R
NC-11
0.40 0.40 15.30 15.30 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
421 McCormick, Rich R
GA-6
0.40 0.40 2.90 2.90 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
422 Moran, Nathaniel R
TX-1
0.40 0.40 7.28 7.28 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
423 Strong, Dale R
AL-5
0.40 0.40 2.91 2.91 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
424 Letlow, Julia R
LA-5
0.22 0.00 8.33 11.35 Strong Rep - 69.78 rank 5
425 Carl, Jerry R
AL-1
0.21 0.00 2.52 2.41 Strong Rep - 69.79 rank 5
426 LaTurner, Jake R
KS-2
0.21 0.40 5.40 8.39 Strong Rep - 69.79 rank 5
427 Ezell, Mike R
MS-4
0.00 0.00 2.83 2.83 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
428 Franklin, Scott R
FL-18
0.00 0.00 1.01 1.29 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
429 Houchin, Erin R
IN-9
0.00 0.00 1.28 1.28 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
430 McClain, Lisa R
MI-9
0.00 0.00 2.70 2.90 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
431 Pfluger, August R
TX-11
0.00 0.00 1.19 2.10 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

2Nancy Pelosi's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

4Mike Johnson's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

5Absences due to sudden death of husband not included in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)