What: All Issues
 Who: House of Representatives
[POW!]
 

To sort by a column, click on the down-pointing triangle above that column. To reverse the sort,
click on the triangle above the current sort column and the triangle will now point up once it's reverse sorted.

PROGRESSIVE SCORE Progressive Score
Rank Member of Congress Party District Crucial Votes % Overall % District Tilt vs. District Tilt
Lifetime 2023-24 Lifetime 2023-24 % Rating
1 Lee, Summer D
PA-12
100.00 100.00 99.07 99.07 Strong Dem + 16.67 rank 5
2 Tokuda, Jill D
HI-2
99.24 99.24 97.83 97.83 Strong Dem + 15.91 rank 5
3 Balint, Becca D
VT-AL
99.24 99.24 98.43 98.43 Strong Dem + 15.91 rank 5
4 Casar, Greg D
TX-35
98.86 98.86 98.91 98.91 Strong Dem + 15.53 rank 5
5 Foushee, Valerie D
NC-4
98.48 98.48 96.87 96.87 Strong Dem + 15.15 rank 5
6 Frost, Maxwell D
FL-10
98.48 98.48 98.60 98.60 Strong Dem + 15.15 rank 5
7 Ramirez, Delia D
IL-3
98.48 98.48 98.74 98.74 Strong Dem + 15.15 rank 5
8 Pocan, Mark D
WI-2
98.46 99.62 99.06 99.37 Strong Dem + 15.13 rank 5
9 Jayapal, Pramila D
WA-7
98.23 99.24 99.29 99.38 Strong Dem + 14.90 rank 5
10 Raskin, Jamie D
MD-8
98.23 97.35 98.51 96.40 Strong Dem + 14.90 rank 5
11 Williams, Nikema D
GA-5
98.19 97.35 97.85 96.42 Strong Dem + 14.86 rank 5
12 Leger Fernandez, Teresa D
NM-3
94.78 93.56 95.74 93.94 Leans Dem + 14.78 rank 5
13 Bowman, Jamaal D
NY-16
97.99 98.86 98.35 98.44 Strong Dem + 14.66 rank 5
14 Jacobs, Sara D
CA-51
97.78 98.86 97.92 97.66 Strong Dem + 14.45 rank 5
15 DeSaulnier, Mark D
CA-10
97.64 98.11 98.61 97.15 Strong Dem + 14.31 rank 5
16 Espaillat, Adriano D
NY-13
97.42 95.08 98.32 96.09 Strong Dem + 14.09 rank 5
17 Kamlager-Dove, Sydney D
CA-37
97.34 97.34 97.81 97.81 Strong Dem + 14.01 rank 5
18 Tlaib, Rashida D
MI-12
97.28 99.24 97.58 98.60 Strong Dem + 13.95 rank 5
19 Omar, Ilhan D
MN-5
97.27 97.71 97.56 97.34 Strong Dem + 13.94 rank 5
20 Bush, Cori1 D
MO-1
97.23 97.87 97.84 98.35 Strong Dem + 13.90 rank 5
21 Khanna, Ro D
CA-17
97.15 98.48 98.29 97.05 Strong Dem + 13.82 rank 5
22 McGovern, Jim D
MA-2
97.13 98.86 97.60 98.60 Strong Dem + 13.80 rank 5
23 Ocasio-Cortez, Alexandria D
NY-14
97.10 99.23 97.30 98.74 Strong Dem + 13.77 rank 5
24 Watson Coleman, Bonnie D
NJ-12
96.98 98.11 98.61 97.51 Strong Dem + 13.65 rank 5
25 Crockett, Jasmine D
TX-30
96.97 96.97 96.12 96.12 Strong Dem + 13.64 rank 5
26 Garcia, Robert D
CA-42
96.96 96.96 97.64 97.64 Strong Dem + 13.63 rank 5
27 Pressley, Ayanna D
MA-7
96.93 95.79 97.87 97.24 Strong Dem + 13.60 rank 5
28 Gomez, Jimmy D
CA-34
96.91 95.82 98.18 96.55 Strong Dem + 13.58 rank 5
29 Clark, Katherine D
MA-5
96.86 97.35 98.26 95.66 Strong Dem + 13.53 rank 5
30 Clarke, Yvette1 D
NY-9
96.80 98.86 98.32 98.13 Strong Dem + 13.47 rank 5
31 Brown, Shontel D
OH-11
96.72 97.35 96.42 95.50 Strong Dem + 13.39 rank 5
32 Chu, Judy D
CA-28
96.72 96.21 98.17 97.35 Strong Dem + 13.39 rank 5
33 Schakowsky, Jan D
IL-9
96.71 96.95 98.14 97.63 Strong Dem + 13.38 rank 5
34 Jackson, Jonathan D
IL-1
96.59 96.59 96.72 96.72 Strong Dem + 13.26 rank 5
35 Grijalva, Raul1 D
AZ-7
96.58 99.08 98.09 98.77 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
36 Stansbury, Melanie D
NM-1
96.58 96.97 96.71 95.79 Strong Dem + 13.25 rank 5
37 Kildee, Dan1 D
MI-8
89.71 86.92 95.94 91.52 Swing + 13.04 rank 5
38 McGarvey, Morgan D
KY-3
96.21 96.21 95.50 95.50 Strong Dem + 12.88 rank 5
39 Velazquez, Nydia D
NY-7
95.96 97.73 97.09 98.28 Strong Dem + 12.63 rank 5
40 Barragán, Nanette D
CA-44
95.90 96.20 97.75 96.72 Strong Dem + 12.57 rank 5
41 McClellan, Jennifer D
VA-4
95.89 95.89 94.71 94.71 Strong Dem + 12.56 rank 5
42 Neguse, Joe D
CO-2
95.76 95.08 97.16 94.42 Strong Dem + 12.43 rank 5
43 Escobar, Veronica D
TX-16
95.75 96.20 97.43 95.78 Strong Dem + 12.42 rank 5
44 Lee, Barbara D
CA-12
95.70 98.07 97.66 98.70 Strong Dem + 12.37 rank 5
45 Porter, Katie D
CA-47
89.00 92.22 95.27 94.73 Swing + 12.33 rank 5
46 Trahan, Lori D
MA-3
95.42 95.45 97.37 95.47 Strong Dem + 12.09 rank 5
47 Sanchez, Linda D
CA-38
95.27 96.58 97.23 95.79 Strong Dem + 11.94 rank 5
48 Nadler, Jerry D
NY-12
95.24 97.73 96.80 97.20 Strong Dem + 11.91 rank 5
49 Cherfilus-McCormick, Sheila D
FL-20
95.18 96.21 95.56 94.84 Strong Dem + 11.85 rank 5
50 Takano, Mark D
CA-39
95.18 98.86 97.85 97.50 Strong Dem + 11.85 rank 5
51 Garcia, Jesús D
IL-4
95.17 91.41 97.89 95.39 Strong Dem + 11.84 rank 5
52 Ivey, Glenn D
MD-4
95.08 95.08 94.38 94.38 Strong Dem + 11.75 rank 5
53 Garcia, Sylvia D
TX-29
95.07 96.20 96.86 95.71 Strong Dem + 11.74 rank 5
54 Bonamici, Suzanne1 D
OR-1
94.97 99.59 97.53 97.97 Strong Dem + 11.64 rank 5
55 Dean, Madeleine D
PA-4
94.74 95.83 96.99 95.01 Strong Dem + 11.41 rank 5
56 Casten, Sean D
IL-6
91.31 93.89 95.78 94.21 Leans Dem + 11.31 rank 5
57 Levin, Mike D
CA-49
87.95 87.12 94.80 91.32 Swing + 11.28 rank 5
58 Huffman, Jared D
CA-2
94.44 96.21 97.70 96.67 Strong Dem + 11.11 rank 5
59 Hayes, Jahana D
CT-5
90.99 88.64 95.84 92.39 Leans Dem + 10.99 rank 5
60 Cartwright, Matt D
PA-8
84.31 84.47 94.11 89.06 Leans Rep + 10.98 rank 5
61 Amo, Gabe D
RI-1
94.25 94.25 90.80 90.80 Strong Dem + 10.92 rank 5
62 Pingree, Chellie D
ME-1
93.86 96.15 97.18 96.23 Strong Dem + 10.53 rank 5
63 Scanlon, Mary Gay D
PA-5
93.74 94.66 96.96 95.25 Strong Dem + 10.41 rank 5
64 Auchincloss, Jake D
MA-4
93.72 91.15 95.59 93.21 Strong Dem + 10.39 rank 5
65 Jeffries, Hakeem D
NY-8
93.71 94.32 96.91 94.07 Strong Dem + 10.38 rank 5
66 Moore, Gwen D
WI-4
93.64 96.17 97.16 97.12 Strong Dem + 10.31 rank 5
67 Thanedar, Shri D
MI-13
93.56 93.56 93.63 93.63 Strong Dem + 10.23 rank 5
68 Mullin, Kevin D
CA-15
93.54 93.54 94.23 94.23 Strong Dem + 10.21 rank 5
69 Davis, Danny D
IL-7
93.49 96.95 96.19 96.18 Strong Dem + 10.16 rank 5
70 Torres, Ritchie D
NY-15
93.36 89.35 95.44 92.46 Strong Dem + 10.03 rank 5
71 Pelosi, Nancy2 D
CA-11
93.29 89.92 94.78 92.28 Strong Dem + 9.96 rank 5
72 Waters, Maxine D
CA-43
93.26 97.69 95.85 96.97 Strong Dem + 9.93 rank 5
73 Ross, Deborah D
NC-2
93.16 93.54 95.02 93.86 Strong Dem + 9.83 rank 5
74 Carter, Troy D
LA-2
93.11 94.32 94.87 94.20 Strong Dem + 9.78 rank 5
75 Napolitano, Grace D
CA-31
93.02 95.02 95.90 95.24 Strong Dem + 9.69 rank 5
76 Evans, Dwight D
PA-3
92.93 91.95 97.01 94.52 Strong Dem + 9.60 rank 5
77 Kelly, Robin D
IL-2
92.90 96.15 96.80 95.47 Strong Dem + 9.57 rank 5
78 Dingell, Debbie D
MI-6
92.78 97.32 96.95 96.68 Strong Dem + 9.45 rank 5
79 Hoyle, Val D
OR-4
92.64 92.64 94.75 94.75 Strong Dem + 9.31 rank 5
80 Deluzio, Chris D
PA-17
89.02 89.02 91.01 91.01 Leans Dem + 9.02 rank 5
81 Mfume, Kweisi D
MD-7
92.24 95.44 94.62 94.51 Strong Dem + 8.91 rank 5
82 Tonko, Paul D
NY-20
92.20 96.97 96.64 95.96 Strong Dem + 8.87 rank 5
83 Menendez Jr., Rob D
NJ-8
92.05 92.05 93.18 93.18 Strong Dem + 8.72 rank 5
84 DeGette, Diana D
CO-1
91.57 97.73 95.18 96.11 Strong Dem + 8.24 rank 5
85 Adams, Alma D
NC-12
91.57 93.16 96.35 93.92 Strong Dem + 8.24 rank 5
86 Sykes, Emilia D
OH-13
84.79 84.79 90.39 90.39 Swing + 8.12 rank 5
87 Matsui, Doris D
CA-7
91.30 95.44 96.30 94.68 Strong Dem + 7.97 rank 5
88 Sarbanes, John D
MD-3
91.30 95.04 96.69 94.80 Strong Dem + 7.97 rank 5
89 Strickland, Marilyn D
WA-10
91.28 90.38 94.17 92.48 Strong Dem + 7.95 rank 5
90 Lieu, Ted D
CA-36
90.76 92.80 96.12 93.86 Strong Dem + 7.43 rank 5
91 Beyer, Don D
VA-8
90.63 95.82 96.27 96.21 Strong Dem + 7.30 rank 5
92 Underwood, Lauren D
IL-14
90.61 95.06 95.75 95.15 Strong Dem + 7.28 rank 5
93 Cohen, Steve D
TN-9
90.61 89.23 95.93 92.06 Strong Dem + 7.28 rank 5
94 Meng, Grace D
NY-6
90.38 92.75 96.15 94.64 Strong Dem + 7.05 rank 5
95 Blumenauer, Earl D
OR-3
90.35 93.18 94.36 94.97 Strong Dem + 7.02 rank 5
96 Castro, Joaquin1 D
TX-20
90.12 99.20 95.99 97.97 Strong Dem + 6.79 rank 5
97 Blunt Rochester, Lisa D
DE-AL
90.00 92.80 95.78 94.04 Strong Dem + 6.67 rank 5
98 McCollum, Betty D
MN-4
89.95 95.45 95.20 95.32 Strong Dem + 6.62 rank 5
99 Beatty, Joyce D
OH-3
89.89 96.58 95.67 95.20 Strong Dem + 6.56 rank 5
100 Davids, Sharice D
KS-3
82.68 83.33 92.60 88.68 Swing + 6.01 rank 5
101 Wilson, Frederica D
FL-24
89.32 89.27 95.48 92.42 Strong Dem + 5.99 rank 5
102 Mrvan, Frank D
IN-1
85.94 82.20 91.81 88.77 Leans Dem + 5.94 rank 5
103 Soto, Darren D
FL-9
85.71 85.50 94.30 90.05 Leans Dem + 5.71 rank 5
104 Doggett, Lloyd D
TX-37
88.78 96.58 93.13 96.85 Strong Dem + 5.45 rank 5
105 Pallone, Frank D
NJ-6
88.45 93.54 93.66 94.25 Strong Dem + 5.12 rank 5
106 DeLauro, Rosa D
CT-3
88.41 92.80 93.68 93.75 Strong Dem + 5.08 rank 5
107 Johnson, Hank D
GA-4
88.34 93.56 95.82 94.78 Strong Dem + 5.01 rank 5
108 Goldman, Dan D
NY-10
88.26 88.26 92.39 92.39 Strong Dem + 4.93 rank 5
109 Lofgren, Zoe D
CA-18
88.22 93.10 92.91 94.57 Strong Dem + 4.89 rank 5
110 Carson, André D
IN-7
87.99 95.82 95.32 96.09 Strong Dem + 4.66 rank 5
111 Vargas, Juan D
CA-52
87.99 96.96 95.09 95.94 Strong Dem + 4.66 rank 5
112 Trone, David D
MD-6
84.50 83.97 93.43 89.71 Leans Dem + 4.50 rank 5
113 Stevens, Haley D
MI-11
87.78 90.91 94.48 92.40 Strong Dem + 4.45 rank 5
114 Krishnamoorthi, Raja D
IL-8
87.65 92.80 95.03 93.47 Strong Dem + 4.32 rank 5
115 Kaptur, Marcy D
OH-9
77.65 79.92 88.75 87.46 Leans Rep + 4.32 rank 5
116 McBath, Lucy D
GA-7
87.61 93.94 94.30 93.90 Strong Dem + 4.28 rank 5
117 Stanton, Greg D
AZ-4
84.27 81.15 93.05 87.26 Leans Dem + 4.27 rank 5
118 Eshoo, Anna D
CA-16
87.56 93.54 93.19 94.22 Strong Dem + 4.23 rank 5
119 Crow, Jason D
CO-6
87.44 93.18 94.58 94.09 Strong Dem + 4.11 rank 5
120 Frankel, Lois D
FL-22
87.30 87.79 95.06 91.24 Strong Dem + 3.97 rank 5
121 Pettersen, Brittany D
CO-7
87.07 87.07 91.14 91.14 Strong Dem + 3.74 rank 5
122 Neal, Richard D
MA-1
87.01 95.82 93.18 95.13 Strong Dem + 3.68 rank 5
123 Cleaver, Emanuel D
MO-5
86.98 90.87 94.59 92.77 Strong Dem + 3.65 rank 5
124 Morelle, Joseph D
NY-25
86.97 86.21 94.24 90.53 Strong Dem + 3.64 rank 5
125 Kim, Andy D
NJ-3
86.82 90.73 94.33 93.15 Strong Dem + 3.49 rank 5
126 Castor, Kathy D
FL-14
86.76 92.72 94.80 93.09 Strong Dem + 3.43 rank 5
127 Cardenas, Tony D
CA-29
86.72 96.96 94.81 95.89 Strong Dem + 3.39 rank 5
128 Scott, Bobby D
VA-3
86.72 97.35 92.80 96.43 Strong Dem + 3.39 rank 5
129 Wild, Susan D
PA-7
79.97 79.39 91.56 86.59 Swing + 3.30 rank 5
130 Harder, Josh D
CA-9
79.93 78.03 91.64 86.61 Swing + 3.26 rank 5
131 Ryan, Pat D
NY-18
79.93 79.17 87.23 86.18 Swing + 3.26 rank 5
132 Titus, Dina D
NV-1
83.25 88.55 94.18 91.96 Leans Dem + 3.25 rank 5
133 Torres, Norma D
CA-35
86.49 92.05 94.92 93.31 Strong Dem + 3.16 rank 5
134 Larson, John D
CT-1
86.43 90.38 93.33 93.22 Strong Dem + 3.10 rank 5
135 Schrier, Kim D
WA-8
79.76 78.79 91.33 85.42 Swing + 3.09 rank 5
136 Jackson-Lee, Sheila D
TX-18
86.32 80.82 92.28 87.58 Strong Dem + 2.99 rank 5
137 Salinas, Andrea D
OR-6
86.31 86.31 91.22 91.22 Strong Dem + 2.98 rank 5
138 Gallego, Ruben D
AZ-3
85.99 74.22 94.94 84.81 Strong Dem + 2.66 rank 5
139 Quigley, Mike D
IL-5
85.98 91.25 94.37 93.04 Strong Dem + 2.65 rank 5
140 Boyle, Brendan D
PA-2
85.81 88.21 94.70 91.37 Strong Dem + 2.48 rank 5
141 Horsford, Steven D
NV-4
82.28 82.89 92.84 89.61 Leans Dem + 2.28 rank 5
142 Nickel III, Wiley D
NC-13
78.71 78.71 85.85 85.85 Swing + 2.04 rank 5
143 Schiff, Adam D
CA-30
85.11 92.19 93.34 93.66 Strong Dem + 1.78 rank 5
144 Meeks, Gregory D
NY-5
84.80 93.56 92.62 94.35 Strong Dem + 1.47 rank 5
145 Peltola, Mary5 D
AK-AL
74.79 73.52 77.43 75.19 Leans Rep + 1.46 rank 5
146 Scholten, Hilary D
MI-3
81.44 81.44 88.28 88.28 Leans Dem + 1.44 rank 5
147 Landsman, Greg D
OH-1
78.03 78.03 85.31 85.31 Swing + 1.36 rank 5
148 Carbajal, Salud D
CA-24
84.47 89.39 93.77 92.24 Strong Dem + 1.14 rank 5
149 Wexton, Jennifer D
VA-10
84.43 85.38 93.91 90.92 Strong Dem + 1.10 rank 5
150 Swalwell, Eric D
CA-14
84.41 85.49 94.21 90.17 Strong Dem + 1.08 rank 5
151 Wasserman Schultz, Debbie D
FL-25
84.05 89.77 93.90 92.07 Strong Dem + 0.72 rank 5
152 Sorensen, Eric D
IL-17
80.68 80.68 87.40 87.40 Leans Dem + 0.68 rank 5
153 Keating, Bill D
MA-9
83.92 89.77 93.66 92.48 Strong Dem + 0.59 rank 5
154 Thompson, Mike D
CA-4
83.80 90.53 92.39 92.56 Strong Dem + 0.47 rank 5
155 Sherman, Brad D
CA-32
83.70 92.40 91.46 92.97 Strong Dem + 0.37 rank 5
156 Thompson, Bennie D
MS-2
83.70 95.06 91.68 94.98 Strong Dem + 0.37 rank 5
157 Allred, Colin D
TX-32
83.67 83.71 92.04 86.54 Strong Dem + 0.34 rank 5
158 Manning, Kathy D
NC-6
83.67 77.95 90.59 86.47 Strong Dem + 0.34 rank 5
159 Vasquez, Gabe D
NM-2
80.30 80.30 86.49 86.49 Leans Dem + 0.30 rank 5
160 Clyburn, Jim D
SC-6
83.56 95.45 91.64 95.02 Strong Dem + 0.23 rank 5
161 Caraveo, Yadira D
CO-8
76.83 76.83 83.81 83.81 Swing + 0.16 rank 5
162 Garamendi, John D
CA-8
83.28 93.54 93.08 93.30 Strong Dem - 0.05 rank 5
163 Jackson, Jeff D
NC-14
83.27 83.27 89.56 89.56 Strong Dem - 0.06 rank 5
164 Fletcher , Lizzie D
TX-7
83.16 84.41 91.22 87.11 Strong Dem - 0.17 rank 5
165 Courtney, Joe D
CT-2
79.70 86.36 93.18 90.81 Leans Dem - 0.30 rank 5
166 Correa, Lou D
CA-46
82.83 88.89 92.14 91.09 Strong Dem - 0.50 rank 5
167 DelBene, Suzan D
WA-1
82.82 94.32 93.90 94.42 Strong Dem - 0.51 rank 5
168 Pappas, Chris D
NH-1
79.29 76.52 90.59 83.41 Leans Dem - 0.71 rank 5
169 Pascrell, Bill D
NJ-9
82.55 93.16 91.17 93.60 Strong Dem - 0.78 rank 5
170 Norcross, Donald D
NJ-1
82.41 84.88 93.80 90.11 Strong Dem - 0.92 rank 5
171 Moulton, Seth D
MA-6
82.30 88.26 93.42 91.12 Strong Dem - 1.03 rank 5
172 Slotkin, Elissa D
MI-7
75.64 80.68 89.37 88.06 Swing - 1.03 rank 5
173 Magaziner, Seth D
RI-2
82.17 82.17 89.67 89.67 Strong Dem - 1.16 rank 5
174 Green, Al D
TX-9
82.01 93.92 93.28 94.69 Strong Dem - 1.32 rank 5
175 Lee, Susie D
NV-3
78.60 79.62 90.54 84.83 Leans Dem - 1.40 rank 5
176 Budzinski, Nikki D
IL-13
81.44 81.44 87.91 87.91 Strong Dem - 1.89 rank 5
177 Panetta, Jimmy D
CA-19
81.41 82.58 92.74 88.37 Strong Dem - 1.92 rank 5
178 Houlahan, Chrissy D
PA-6
81.29 82.89 92.08 88.33 Strong Dem - 2.04 rank 5
179 Gluesenkamp Perez, Marie D
WA-3
71.21 71.21 73.09 73.09 Leans Rep - 2.12 rank 5
180 Veasey, Mark D
TX-33
80.84 88.26 92.55 88.98 Strong Dem - 2.49 rank 5
181 Suozzi, Thomas D
NY-3
74.12 65.22 90.71 68.49 Swing - 2.55 rank 5
182 Lynch, Stephen D
MA-8
80.49 89.02 91.83 92.01 Strong Dem - 2.84 rank 5
183 Kuster, Annie D
NH-2
77.08 87.69 92.02 91.20 Leans Dem - 2.92 rank 5
184 Sherrill, Mikie D
NJ-11
79.80 83.71 91.55 89.11 Strong Dem - 3.53 rank 5
185 Kilmer, Derek D
WA-6
79.57 87.45 92.94 91.39 Strong Dem - 3.76 rank 5
186 Hoyer, Steny D
MD-5
79.35 89.62 89.76 91.67 Strong Dem - 3.98 rank 5
187 Aguilar, Pete D
CA-33
79.24 94.32 92.72 94.09 Strong Dem - 4.09 rank 5
188 Phillips, Dean D
MN-3
78.73 69.80 91.43 81.05 Strong Dem - 4.60 rank 5
189 Craig, Angie D
MN-2
75.30 78.24 88.22 81.88 Leans Dem - 4.70 rank 5
190 Connolly, Gerry D
VA-11
78.60 93.56 92.29 94.46 Strong Dem - 4.73 rank 5
191 Larsen, Rick D
WA-2
78.29 90.80 90.84 92.99 Strong Dem - 5.04 rank 5
192 Moskowitz, Jared D
FL-23
74.43 74.43 83.78 83.78 Leans Dem - 5.57 rank 5
193 González, Vicente D
TX-34
77.49 80.53 88.41 82.03 Strong Dem - 5.84 rank 5
194 Brownley, Julia D
CA-26
77.22 92.05 92.07 93.45 Strong Dem - 6.11 rank 5
195 Spanberger, Abigail D
VA-7
73.51 80.68 88.64 87.36 Leans Dem - 6.49 rank 5
196 Himes, Jim D
CT-4
76.52 87.83 90.60 91.42 Strong Dem - 6.81 rank 5
197 Smith, Adam D
WA-9
76.40 95.06 88.24 94.98 Strong Dem - 6.93 rank 5
198 Foster, Bill D
IL-11
75.98 91.29 91.19 92.98 Strong Dem - 7.35 rank 5
199 Case, Ed D
HI-1
75.42 85.23 86.01 89.74 Strong Dem - 7.91 rank 5
200 Golden, Jared D
ME-2
64.91 69.47 79.66 69.59 Leans Rep - 8.42 rank 5
201 Sewell, Terri D
AL-7
74.88 88.21 90.39 91.16 Strong Dem - 8.45 rank 5
202 Ruiz, Raul D
CA-25
73.38 92.42 90.19 93.31 Strong Dem - 9.95 rank 5
203 Davis, Don D
NC-1
69.96 69.96 76.32 76.32 Leans Dem - 10.04 rank 5
204 Schneider, Brad D
IL-10
72.69 85.11 88.69 89.92 Strong Dem - 10.64 rank 5
205 Scott, David D
GA-13
72.44 87.45 88.93 90.25 Strong Dem - 10.89 rank 5
206 Bera, Ami D
CA-6
71.72 89.77 89.81 92.38 Strong Dem - 11.61 rank 5
207 Ruppersberger, Dutch D
MD-2
71.50 91.60 88.98 93.24 Strong Dem - 11.83 rank 5
208 Gottheimer, Josh D
NJ-5
66.17 74.43 84.65 84.39 Leans Dem - 13.83 rank 5
209 Peters, Scott D
CA-50
68.09 86.74 86.99 90.81 Strong Dem - 15.24 rank 5
210 Bishop, Sanford D
GA-2
62.90 90.15 80.70 91.26 Leans Dem - 17.10 rank 5
211 Costa, Jim D
CA-21
53.22 78.46 76.49 83.92 Strong Dem - 30.11 rank 5
212 Cuellar, Henry D
TX-28
49.19 72.73 75.71 76.69 Leans Dem - 30.81 rank 5
213 Massie, Thomas R
KY-4
20.55 11.79 12.59 8.95 Strong Rep - 49.45 rank 5
214 Fitzpatrick, Brian R
PA-1
23.37 27.65 35.33 40.62 Swing - 53.30 rank 5
215 Smith, Chris R
NJ-4
14.61 3.41 20.58 15.02 Strong Rep - 55.39 rank 5
216 Griffith, Morgan R
VA-9
11.68 4.20 7.23 6.29 Strong Rep - 58.32 rank 5
217 McClintock, Tom R
CA-5
10.55 4.17 5.23 4.20 Strong Rep - 59.45 rank 5
218 Biggs, Andy R
AZ-5
9.63 9.09 5.71 6.83 Strong Rep - 60.37 rank 5
219 Mace, Nancy R
SC-1
8.45 10.65 15.14 18.53 Strong Rep - 61.55 rank 5
220 Gaetz, Matt R
FL-1
8.32 9.47 8.04 7.96 Strong Rep - 61.68 rank 5
221 Stefanik, Elise R
NY-21
7.60 0.76 13.02 5.12 Strong Rep - 62.40 rank 5
222 Posey, Bill R
FL-8
7.28 2.66 5.81 3.65 Strong Rep - 62.72 rank 5
223 Gosar, Paul R
AZ-9
6.63 3.47 4.63 4.35 Strong Rep - 63.37 rank 5
224 Diaz-Balart, Mario R
FL-26
6.24 0.00 11.69 15.43 Strong Rep - 63.76 rank 5
225 Roy, Chip R
TX-21
6.16 4.58 6.07 4.72 Strong Rep - 63.84 rank 5
226 Davidson, Warren R
OH-8
6.14 2.66 4.21 3.74 Strong Rep - 63.86 rank 5
227 Buchanan, Vern R
FL-16
5.81 0.38 8.62 8.68 Strong Rep - 64.19 rank 5
228 Harris, Andy R
MD-1
5.78 2.66 4.00 3.12 Strong Rep - 64.22 rank 5
229 Burchett, Tim R
TN-2
5.10 6.44 4.18 4.96 Strong Rep - 64.90 rank 5
230 Rosendale, Matt R
MT-2
5.02 6.82 4.89 5.59 Strong Rep - 64.98 rank 5
231 Joyce, David R
OH-14
4.92 1.92 11.87 19.13 Strong Rep - 65.08 rank 5
232 Mast, Brian R
FL-21
4.91 2.29 7.72 3.61 Strong Rep - 65.09 rank 5
233 Mooney, Alex R
WV-2
4.74 1.17 3.64 1.77 Strong Rep - 65.26 rank 5
234 Jordan, Jim R
OH-4
4.67 2.66 2.35 1.87 Strong Rep - 65.33 rank 5
235 Bishop, Dan R
NC-8
4.66 3.85 3.49 4.48 Strong Rep - 65.34 rank 5
236 Greene, Marjorie R
GA-14
4.44 4.56 4.62 4.44 Strong Rep - 65.56 rank 5
237 Duncan, Jeff R
SC-3
4.42 2.29 2.73 1.71 Strong Rep - 65.58 rank 5
238 Burgess, Mike R
TX-26
4.19 0.76 4.01 4.51 Strong Rep - 65.81 rank 5
239 Good, Bob R
VA-5
4.06 4.96 4.31 4.84 Strong Rep - 65.94 rank 5
240 Comer, James R
KY-1
3.93 2.65 2.58 2.18 Strong Rep - 66.07 rank 5
241 Cloud, Michael R
TX-27
3.93 3.03 3.08 3.11 Strong Rep - 66.07 rank 5
242 Grothman, Glenn R
WI-6
3.85 0.76 2.89 1.57 Strong Rep - 66.15 rank 5
243 Thompson, Glenn R
PA-15
3.78 1.14 8.83 14.35 Strong Rep - 66.22 rank 5
244 Simpson, Mike R
ID-2
3.67 1.14 9.79 19.43 Strong Rep - 66.33 rank 5
245 Norman, Ralph R
SC-5
3.65 3.04 2.38 3.79 Strong Rep - 66.35 rank 5
246 Perry, Scott R
PA-10
6.87 2.66 3.82 3.48 Leans Rep - 66.46 rank 5
247 Graves, Garret R
LA-6
3.49 1.52 5.25 8.10 Strong Rep - 66.51 rank 5
248 Brecheen, Josh R
OK-2
3.42 3.42 3.27 3.27 Strong Rep - 66.58 rank 5
249 Burlison, Eric R
MO-7
3.41 3.41 3.11 3.11 Strong Rep - 66.59 rank 5
250 Emmer, Tom R
MN-6
3.26 1.52 4.62 2.48 Strong Rep - 66.74 rank 5
251 Spartz, Victoria R
IN-5
3.23 4.20 4.72 4.90 Strong Rep - 66.77 rank 5
252 Newhouse, Dan R
WA-4
3.16 1.15 8.87 16.45 Strong Rep - 66.84 rank 5
253 Bost, Mike R
IL-12
3.15 1.52 6.77 2.95 Strong Rep - 66.85 rank 5
254 Rogers, Mike R
AL-3
3.13 1.14 6.70 8.29 Strong Rep - 66.87 rank 5
255 Bilirakis, Gus R
FL-12
3.13 3.03 5.64 4.37 Strong Rep - 66.87 rank 5
256 Crane, Eli R
AZ-2
6.44 6.44 5.62 5.62 Leans Rep - 66.89 rank 5
257 Higgins, Clay R
LA-3
3.05 2.65 2.41 2.51 Strong Rep - 66.95 rank 5
258 Collins, Mike R
GA-10
3.03 3.03 2.95 2.95 Strong Rep - 66.97 rank 5
259 Fry, Russell R
SC-7
3.03 3.03 3.89 3.89 Strong Rep - 66.97 rank 5
260 Hageman, Harriet R
WY-AL
3.03 3.03 2.95 2.95 Strong Rep - 66.97 rank 5
261 Cole, Tom R
OK-4
2.97 0.76 8.31 18.31 Strong Rep - 67.03 rank 5
262 Cline, Ben R
VA-6
2.89 2.65 2.32 2.33 Strong Rep - 67.11 rank 5
263 Webster, Dan R
FL-11
2.87 1.52 3.78 3.51 Strong Rep - 67.13 rank 5
264 DesJarlais, Scott R
TN-4
2.82 1.53 2.67 2.83 Strong Rep - 67.18 rank 5
265 Bergman, Jack R
MI-1
2.71 0.76 5.29 5.93 Strong Rep - 67.29 rank 5
266 Ogles IV, Andy R
TN-5
2.67 2.67 3.01 3.01 Strong Rep - 67.33 rank 5
267 Foxx, Virginia R
NC-5
2.67 1.52 2.59 3.27 Strong Rep - 67.33 rank 5
268 Bean, Aaron R
FL-4
2.65 2.65 2.18 2.18 Strong Rep - 67.35 rank 5
269 Amodei, Mark R
NV-2
2.61 0.00 6.14 9.33 Strong Rep - 67.39 rank 5
270 Loudermilk, Barry R
GA-11
2.61 1.53 1.57 1.74 Strong Rep - 67.39 rank 5
271 Steube, Greg R
FL-17
2.60 2.35 2.64 2.75 Strong Rep - 67.40 rank 5
272 Weber, Randy R
TX-14
2.60 2.27 1.84 1.72 Strong Rep - 67.40 rank 5
273 Aderholt, Robert R
AL-4
2.58 0.76 5.95 6.12 Strong Rep - 67.42 rank 5
274 Rogers, Hal R
KY-5
2.58 0.39 7.78 16.85 Strong Rep - 67.42 rank 5
275 Stauber, Pete R
MN-8
2.55 1.14 9.84 4.39 Strong Rep - 67.45 rank 5
276 Tiffany, Tom R
WI-7
2.53 2.65 2.55 2.64 Strong Rep - 67.47 rank 5
277 Graves, Sam R
MO-6
2.50 1.52 3.93 5.60 Strong Rep - 67.50 rank 5
278 Maloy, Celeste R
UT-2
2.44 2.44 3.62 3.62 Strong Rep - 67.56 rank 5
279 Armstrong, Kelly R
ND-AL
2.39 1.53 6.66 8.62 Strong Rep - 67.61 rank 5
280 Hunt, Wesley R
TX-38
2.37 2.37 2.74 2.74 Strong Rep - 67.63 rank 5
281 Langworthy, Nick R
NY-23
2.32 2.32 7.02 7.02 Strong Rep - 67.68 rank 5
282 Miller, Max R
OH-7
2.31 2.31 9.98 9.98 Strong Rep - 67.69 rank 5
283 McMorris Rodgers, Cathy R
WA-5
2.30 0.38 4.11 3.65 Strong Rep - 67.70 rank 5
284 Curtis, John R
UT-3
2.24 2.28 5.53 10.53 Strong Rep - 67.76 rank 5
285 Malliotakis, Nicole R
NY-11
2.23 2.32 10.84 9.02 Strong Rep - 67.77 rank 5
286 Nehls, Troy R
TX-22
2.23 2.66 2.45 3.05 Strong Rep - 67.77 rank 5
287 Kim, Young R
CA-40
2.21 1.90 17.38 21.22 Strong Rep - 67.79 rank 5
288 Gooden, Lance R
TX-5
2.21 1.89 2.06 1.87 Strong Rep - 67.79 rank 5
289 Finstad, Brad R
MN-1
2.17 2.28 2.28 2.02 Strong Rep - 67.83 rank 5
290 Hill, French R
AR-2
2.12 0.38 4.43 8.24 Strong Rep - 67.88 rank 5
291 McCaul, Michael R
TX-10
2.08 0.76 4.94 10.50 Strong Rep - 67.92 rank 5
292 Palmer, Gary R
AL-6
2.03 1.53 1.23 1.57 Strong Rep - 67.97 rank 5
293 Granger, Kay R
TX-12
2.02 0.00 5.32 10.36 Strong Rep - 67.98 rank 5
294 Donalds, Byron R
FL-19
2.01 2.65 2.26 2.81 Strong Rep - 67.99 rank 5
295 Issa, Darrell R
CA-48
2.01 3.03 3.72 6.12 Strong Rep - 67.99 rank 5
296 LaMalfa, Doug R
CA-1
1.97 1.90 2.61 2.54 Strong Rep - 68.03 rank 5
297 Scott, Austin R
GA-8
1.97 0.76 2.86 10.09 Strong Rep - 68.03 rank 5
298 Van Drew, Jeff R
NJ-2
5.28 1.14 28.66 4.21 Leans Rep - 68.05 rank 5
299 Lucas, Frank R
OK-3
1.94 0.00 5.78 17.87 Strong Rep - 68.06 rank 5
300 Smith, Jason R
MO-8
1.92 1.15 1.68 2.84 Strong Rep - 68.08 rank 5
301 Johnson, Mike4 R
LA-4
1.92 0.93 1.96 1.03 Strong Rep - 68.08 rank 5
302 Arrington , Jodey R
TX-19
1.91 1.90 2.02 3.65 Strong Rep - 68.09 rank 5
303 Mills, Cory R
FL-7
1.90 1.90 3.28 3.28 Strong Rep - 68.10 rank 5
304 Self, Keith R
TX-3
1.89 1.89 2.48 2.48 Strong Rep - 68.11 rank 5
305 Waltz, Michael R
FL-6
1.88 0.00 5.97 1.63 Strong Rep - 68.12 rank 5
306 Crawford, Rick R
AR-1
1.85 1.52 4.06 6.25 Strong Rep - 68.15 rank 5
307 Yakym III, Rudy R
IN-2
1.84 1.89 4.30 4.19 Strong Rep - 68.16 rank 5
308 Miller, Mary R
IL-15
1.82 2.65 2.80 2.80 Strong Rep - 68.18 rank 5
309 Hudson, Richard R
NC-9
1.81 0.38 2.99 5.06 Strong Rep - 68.19 rank 5
310 Mann, Tracey R
KS-1
1.81 2.65 2.47 3.57 Strong Rep - 68.19 rank 5
311 Moore, Barry R
AL-2
1.81 3.03 2.07 2.64 Strong Rep - 68.19 rank 5
312 Banks, Jim R
IN-3
1.77 1.52 1.72 2.98 Strong Rep - 68.23 rank 5
313 Smucker, Lloyd R
PA-11
1.77 1.14 4.19 4.98 Strong Rep - 68.23 rank 5
314 Womack, Steve R
AR-3
1.77 0.76 6.56 17.52 Strong Rep - 68.23 rank 5
315 Lamborn, Doug R
CO-5
1.75 0.38 1.43 2.34 Strong Rep - 68.25 rank 5
316 Tenney, Claudia R
NY-24
1.73 0.76 4.22 3.74 Strong Rep - 68.27 rank 5
317 Kelly, Mike R
PA-16
1.71 0.00 6.06 12.01 Strong Rep - 68.29 rank 5
318 Wilson, Joe R
SC-2
1.70 0.38 2.32 3.74 Strong Rep - 68.30 rank 5
319 Fulcher, Russ R
ID-1
1.70 1.14 1.80 2.02 Strong Rep - 68.30 rank 5
320 Wenstrup, Brad R
OH-2
1.69 0.00 2.58 4.50 Strong Rep - 68.31 rank 5
321 Moolenaar, John R
MI-2
1.68 2.28 4.45 6.83 Strong Rep - 68.32 rank 5
322 Garbarino, Andrew R
NY-2
1.62 1.15 17.35 20.53 Strong Rep - 68.38 rank 5
323 Cammack, Kat R
FL-3
1.61 2.29 2.59 2.37 Strong Rep - 68.39 rank 5
324 Clyde, Andrew R
GA-9
1.61 2.27 1.83 2.49 Strong Rep - 68.39 rank 5
325 Obernolte, Jay R
CA-23
1.61 0.38 13.93 17.40 Strong Rep - 68.39 rank 5
326 Walberg, Timothy R
MI-5
1.60 0.00 2.77 6.06 Strong Rep - 68.40 rank 5
327 Scalise, Steve R
LA-1
1.57 0.39 1.75 1.98 Strong Rep - 68.43 rank 5
328 Carter, John R
TX-31
1.54 0.00 4.24 8.29 Strong Rep - 68.46 rank 5
329 Green, Mark R
TN-7
1.54 1.91 1.67 1.88 Strong Rep - 68.46 rank 5
330 McHenry, Patrick R
NC-10
1.54 0.39 2.95 5.26 Strong Rep - 68.46 rank 5
331 Barr, Andy R
KY-6
1.52 0.00 3.23 4.82 Strong Rep - 68.48 rank 5
332 Luttrell, Morgan R
TX-8
1.52 1.52 1.87 1.87 Strong Rep - 68.48 rank 5
333 Rouzer, David R
NC-7
1.45 0.00 2.12 2.65 Strong Rep - 68.55 rank 5
334 Fitzgerald, Scott R
WI-5
1.41 2.27 1.41 1.71 Strong Rep - 68.59 rank 5
335 Fischbach, Michelle R
MN-7
1.41 2.27 2.06 2.18 Strong Rep - 68.59 rank 5
336 Harshbarger, Diana R
TN-1
1.41 2.65 1.48 2.33 Strong Rep - 68.59 rank 5
337 Crenshaw, Dan R
TX-2
1.37 0.77 6.90 8.94 Strong Rep - 68.63 rank 5
338 Meuser, Dan R
PA-9
1.36 1.53 4.40 5.84 Strong Rep - 68.64 rank 5
339 Wagner, Ann R
MO-2
1.35 0.00 5.65 14.89 Strong Rep - 68.65 rank 5
340 LaHood, Darin R
IL-16
1.35 0.38 3.82 7.84 Strong Rep - 68.65 rank 5
341 Westerman, Bruce R
AR-4
1.34 1.52 1.74 3.88 Strong Rep - 68.66 rank 5
342 Bucshon, Larry R
IN-8
1.31 0.38 5.59 16.96 Strong Rep - 68.69 rank 5
343 Fleischmann, Chuck R
TN-3
1.25 1.89 4.78 16.95 Strong Rep - 68.75 rank 5
344 Babin, Brian R
TX-36
1.24 0.77 1.02 0.78 Strong Rep - 68.76 rank 5
345 Ferguson, Drew R
GA-3
1.22 1.14 2.20 4.04 Strong Rep - 68.78 rank 5
346 Smith, Adrian R
NE-3
1.22 0.00 2.25 4.39 Strong Rep - 68.78 rank 5
347 Zinke, Ryan R
MT-1
4.55 1.89 6.09 6.21 Leans Rep - 68.78 rank 5
348 Fallon, Pat R
TX-4
1.21 1.89 1.25 1.58 Strong Rep - 68.79 rank 5
349 Moore, Blake R
UT-1
1.20 1.14 10.54 13.75 Strong Rep - 68.80 rank 5
350 Owens, Burgess R
UT-4
1.20 1.89 6.36 8.39 Strong Rep - 68.80 rank 5
351 Kelly, Trent R
MS-1
1.18 0.00 1.26 1.24 Strong Rep - 68.82 rank 5
352 Williams, Roger R
TX-25
1.18 0.39 1.52 0.82 Strong Rep - 68.82 rank 5
353 Carter, Buddy R
GA-1
1.13 0.38 2.06 3.58 Strong Rep - 68.87 rank 5
354 Guthrie, Brett R
KY-2
1.08 0.00 4.36 7.13 Strong Rep - 68.92 rank 5
355 Pence, Greg R
IN-6
1.03 0.00 4.98 8.17 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
356 Timmons, William R
SC-4
1.03 1.52 1.59 2.02 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
357 Miller, Carol R
WV-1
1.03 1.14 2.45 1.89 Strong Rep - 68.97 rank 5
358 Johnson, Dusty R
SD-AL
1.02 0.38 4.13 3.73 Strong Rep - 68.98 rank 5
359 Hern, Kevin R
OK-1
1.01 0.76 1.28 1.55 Strong Rep - 68.99 rank 5
360 Bentz, Cliff R
OR-2
1.00 1.52 4.37 5.90 Strong Rep - 69.00 rank 5
361 Luetkemeyer, Blaine R
MO-3
0.97 0.39 3.45 4.82 Strong Rep - 69.03 rank 5
362 Sessions, Pete R
TX-17
0.96 0.00 1.66 2.92 Strong Rep - 69.04 rank 5
363 Rutherford, John R
FL-5
0.96 0.38 6.07 7.02 Strong Rep - 69.04 rank 5
364 Boebert, Lauren R
CO-3
4.25 4.21 4.72 4.31 Leans Rep - 69.08 rank 5
365 Allen, Rick R
GA-12
0.90 1.14 0.93 2.34 Strong Rep - 69.10 rank 5
366 Latta, Bob R
OH-5
0.86 0.38 1.92 5.27 Strong Rep - 69.14 rank 5
367 Reschenthaler, Guy R
PA-14
0.85 0.76 5.49 2.64 Strong Rep - 69.15 rank 5
368 Guest, Michael R
MS-3
0.85 0.76 2.97 3.43 Strong Rep - 69.15 rank 5
369 Baird, Jim R
IN-4
0.85 1.52 7.42 15.24 Strong Rep - 69.15 rank 5
370 Van Duyne, Beth R
TX-24
0.81 1.15 1.41 1.25 Strong Rep - 69.19 rank 5
371 Giménez, Carlos R
FL-28
0.81 0.00 10.93 10.97 Strong Rep - 69.19 rank 5
372 Feenstra, Randy R
IA-4
0.80 0.38 3.96 4.65 Strong Rep - 69.20 rank 5
373 Alford, Mark R
MO-4
0.76 0.76 2.17 2.17 Strong Rep - 69.24 rank 5
374 Lee, Laurel R
FL-15
0.76 0.76 11.66 11.66 Strong Rep - 69.24 rank 5
375 Rose, John R
TN-6
0.68 0.00 1.87 2.50 Strong Rep - 69.32 rank 5
376 Turner, Mike R
OH-10
4.00 3.47 11.74 20.71 Leans Rep - 69.33 rank 5
377 Flood, Mike R
NE-1
0.64 0.76 11.13 12.91 Strong Rep - 69.36 rank 5
378 Murphy, Greg R
NC-3
0.56 0.38 3.93 5.21 Strong Rep - 69.44 rank 5
379 Estes, Ron R
KS-4
0.56 0.38 1.21 1.56 Strong Rep - 69.44 rank 5
380 Dunn, Neal R
FL-2
0.55 0.38 3.71 7.33 Strong Rep - 69.45 rank 5
381 Luna, Anna R
FL-13
3.88 3.88 4.40 4.40 Leans Rep - 69.45 rank 5
382 Joyce, John R
PA-13
0.51 0.76 2.17 2.79 Strong Rep - 69.49 rank 5
383 Ellzey, Jake R
TX-6
0.51 0.38 7.43 10.12 Strong Rep - 69.49 rank 5
384 Balderson, Troy R
OH-12
0.50 0.38 4.21 4.34 Strong Rep - 69.50 rank 5
385 Lesko, Debbie R
AZ-8
0.48 0.00 1.69 1.53 Strong Rep - 69.52 rank 5
386 Kustoff, David R
TN-8
0.41 0.00 2.53 5.71 Strong Rep - 69.59 rank 5
387 Jackson, Ronny R
TX-13
0.41 0.77 0.67 0.79 Strong Rep - 69.59 rank 5
388 Bice, Stephanie R
OK-5
0.40 0.38 7.51 10.26 Strong Rep - 69.60 rank 5
389 Schweikert, Dave R
AZ-1
7.06 2.65 4.92 6.24 Swing - 69.61 rank 5
390 Edwards, Chuck R
NC-11
0.38 0.38 15.09 15.09 Strong Rep - 69.62 rank 5
391 McCormick, Rich R
GA-6
0.38 0.38 3.11 3.11 Strong Rep - 69.62 rank 5
392 Moran, Nathaniel R
TX-1
0.38 0.38 7.19 7.19 Strong Rep - 69.62 rank 5
393 Strong, Dale R
AL-5
0.38 0.38 2.81 2.81 Strong Rep - 69.62 rank 5
394 Letlow, Julia R
LA-5
0.22 0.00 8.16 10.95 Strong Rep - 69.78 rank 5
395 Carl, Jerry R
AL-1
0.20 0.00 2.48 2.33 Strong Rep - 69.80 rank 5
396 LaTurner, Jake R
KS-2
0.20 0.38 5.39 8.26 Strong Rep - 69.80 rank 5
397 Huizenga, Bill R
MI-4
3.37 0.38 3.26 5.16 Leans Rep - 69.96 rank 5
398 Wittman, Rob R
VA-1
3.35 0.00 4.63 3.43 Leans Rep - 69.98 rank 5
399 Ezell, Mike R
MS-4
0.00 0.00 2.73 2.73 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
400 Franklin, Scott R
FL-18
0.00 0.00 0.99 1.24 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
401 Houchin, Erin R
IN-9
0.00 0.00 1.40 1.40 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
402 McClain, Lisa R
MI-9
0.00 0.00 2.65 2.80 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
403 Pfluger, August R
TX-11
0.00 0.00 1.17 2.03 Strong Rep - 70.00 rank 5
404 Chavez-DeRemer, Lori R
OR-5
9.89 9.89 26.86 26.86 Leans Dem - 70.11 rank 5
405 Steil, Bryan R
WI-1
2.38 0.38 6.58 6.10 Leans Rep - 70.95 rank 5
406 Carey, Mike R
OH-15
2.19 2.27 6.69 6.71 Leans Rep - 71.14 rank 5
407 Gonzales, Tony R
TX-23
2.02 1.92 10.80 12.00 Leans Rep - 71.31 rank 5
408 Lawler, Mike R
NY-17
5.32 5.32 25.78 25.78 Swing - 71.35 rank 5
409 Van Orden, Derrick R
WI-3
1.89 1.89 10.30 10.30 Leans Rep - 71.44 rank 5
410 Salazar, Maria R
FL-27
1.64 1.16 16.57 17.67 Leans Rep - 71.69 rank 5
411 Kiley, Kevin R
CA-3
1.52 1.52 21.24 21.24 Leans Rep - 71.81 rank 5
412 LaLota, Nick R
NY-1
1.52 1.52 19.03 19.03 Leans Rep - 71.81 rank 5
413 Calvert, Ken R
CA-41
1.46 0.00 6.84 17.39 Leans Rep - 71.87 rank 5
414 Miller-Meeks, Mariannette R
IA-1
1.41 1.52 10.94 12.04 Leans Rep - 71.92 rank 5
415 Kean Jr., Tom R
NJ-7
4.55 4.55 24.81 24.81 Swing - 72.12 rank 5
416 Nunn, Zachary R
IA-3
4.17 4.17 17.09 17.09 Swing - 72.50 rank 5
417 Hinson, Ashley R
IA-2
0.80 0.00 11.72 14.84 Leans Rep - 72.53 rank 5
418 Molinaro, Marc R
NY-19
3.79 3.79 20.47 20.47 Swing - 72.88 rank 5
419 De la Cruz-Hernandez, Monica R
TX-15
0.38 0.38 5.15 5.15 Leans Rep - 72.95 rank 5
420 Valadao, David R
CA-22
3.62 0.77 10.31 20.38 Swing - 73.05 rank 5
421 Bacon, Don R
NE-2
3.26 1.89 12.62 21.43 Swing - 73.41 rank 5
422 Duarte, John R
CA-13
2.28 2.28 10.44 10.44 Swing - 74.39 rank 5
423 James, John R
MI-10
1.91 1.91 18.18 18.18 Swing - 74.76 rank 5
424 Kiggans, Jen R
VA-2
1.91 1.91 19.84 19.84 Swing - 74.76 rank 5
425 Steele, Michelle R
CA-45
1.41 1.14 10.85 14.31 Swing - 75.26 rank 5
426 Williams, Brandon R
NY-22
0.77 0.77 11.56 11.56 Swing - 75.90 rank 5
427 Ciscomani, Juan R
AZ-6
0.00 0.00 19.09 19.09 Swing - 76.67 rank 5
428 Garcia, Mike R
CA-27
2.13 1.52 10.64 12.73 Leans Dem - 77.87 rank 5
429 D'Esposito, Anthony R
NY-4
0.76 0.76 20.22 20.22 Leans Dem - 79.24 rank 5

1Member's score adjusted - medical absence

2Nancy Pelosi's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

4Mike Johnson's non-votes while Speaker (customary) not counted in scores.

5Absences due to sudden death of husband not included in scores.

District Tilt

We've assessed the State or District Tilt of each political jurisdiction as indicated below. The assessments are based on what could reasonably be expected to happen in an open seat (no incumbent running) race where no scandal was attached to either candidate. The odds calculations are based on a moderately liberal Democrat's chances of winning [NOT a conservative Democrat] in that State or District against a Republican candidate.

Strong Democratic District = 80-100% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Democratic District = 60-80% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Marginal = 40-60% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Leaning Republican = 20-40% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Strong Republican = 0-20% chance moderately liberal Democrat wins open seat general election.

Progressive Score vs. State Tilt

The “%” and “Rating” columns underneath the “Progressive Score vs. State Tilt” are two different ways of measuring the same thing. They both measure how naughty or nice a member of Congress' voting record has been relative to how hospitable his/her state is to a moderate to liberal Democrat. We're grading on a curve. An A in the “Rating” column indicates members of Congress who are doing the best in terms of voting MORE progressively than could necessarily be expected given their states. Those with an F rating are performing the worst in relation to their states.

We do this in a 3 step process:

  1. We start with Progressive Punch's Lifetime Crucial Votes score for each member of Congress.

  2. We identify which of five categories of Democratic strength that member of Congress belongs in (Strong Dem/ Leaning Dem/ Swing/ Leaning Rep/ Strong Rep). To see which of those five categories a given member of Congress is in, view the “District Tilt” category for House members & the “State Tilt” column for Senators.

    [Our assessments of the districts & states are just that, assessments of the districts & states themselves NOT at all how politically comfortable or weak the given member of Congress is in his or her district.]

    For each one of the five categories, there is a minimum percentage that we consider acceptable using the Progressive Punch Lifetime Crucial Votes scores. The percentages that we consider acceptable are:

    Strong Dem83.33 (B)
    Leaning Dem80.00 (B-)
    Swing76.67 (C+)
    Leaning Rep73.33 (C)
    Strong Rep.70.00 (C-)

  3. We then subtract the minimum acceptable percentages listed above in number 2 from that member's Actual Lifetime Crucial Votes percentage. And that's how we come up with the percentage numbers under the “%” underneath the Progressive Score vs. State Tilt column.

    So for example, as of 3/10/15 in the US House Mark Pocan of Wisconsin's 2nd district had a Lifetime Crucial Votes score of 99.15%, best of all returning (non-freshman) members. We have him in a Strong Democratic district. The minimum acceptable Lifetime Crucial Votes score for a Strong Democratic district we have as 83.33%. Subtract 83.33% (minimum desired) from 99.15% (actual) and you get 15.82% which puts him in first place among all Democrats in the House and in fact among all House members in general. So Representative Pocan is the best example of Nice!

    Conversely Kyrsten Sinema (Dem – Arizona 9) has a Lifetime Crucial Votes Score of 36.86%. We have her in a Swing district where the minimum Lifetime Crucial Votes score to be acceptable is 76.67%. Subtract 76.67% (minimum desired) from 36.86% (actual) and you get -39.81%. In other words Sinema is failing, and by a lot.

The “Rating” column with the A – F stars in it is a quick and dirty graphic indication of how well a member is performing in terms of voting record compared to their district.

+6.67% and above except for Strong Dem States and Districts where it's +8.17%= 5 stars (we'd say go out and work for these people)

+3.33% to +6.66% = 4 stars (worthy of support)

Zero to +3.32% = 3 stars (acceptable)

-3.33% to Zero = 2 stars (tolerable)

< -3.33% = 1 star (intolerable, although “intolerable” members from Strong Republican districts probably aren't worth fighting with)